First National Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Rev., 8843.

Decision Date13 January 1942
Docket NumberNo. 8843.,8843.
Citation125 F.2d 157
PartiesFIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MEMPHIS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

F. E. Hagler, of Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, Ralph F. Staubly, J. Louis Monarch, and Louise Foster, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner challenges findings made by the Board of Tax Appeals upon the value of real estate and leasehold interests of the petitioner on the ground that the Board disregarded the uncontroverted evidence of opinion witnesses, and that its findings are therefore not supported by substantial evidence.

It is the view of the court that there was sufficient data before the Board to enable it, as a tribunal developed by experience to expertness in valuations, to sustain its findings; that such data includes the length of the leases, the rentals therein provided, the percentages of occupancy and the financial responsibility of the tenants; and that therefore

The court being without power to reverse fact findings of the Board, Doric Apartment Co. v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 94 F.2d 895, unless the record conclusively shows that such findings are clearly erroneous, Commissioner v. Johnston, 6 Cir., 107 F.2d 883; Crowell v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 62 F.2d 51, and in determining value the Board of Tax Appeals is not bound by the opinion of expert witnesses when contrary to its own judgment. Tracy v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 53 F.2d 575; certiorari denied 287 U.S. 632, 53 S.Ct. 83, 77 L.Ed. 548; Grand Rapids Store Equipment Corp. v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 59 F.2d 914; therefore,

It is ordered that the decision of the Board be and it is hereby

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Dickinson v. Zurko
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1999
    ...U.S. 786, 87 L. Ed. 1153, 63 S. Ct. 981 (1943); Hall v. Commissioner, 128 F.2d 180, 182 (CA7 1942); First National Bank of Memphis v. Commissioner, 125 F.2d 157 (CA6 1942) (per curiam); NLRB v. Algoma Plywood & Veneer Co., 121 F.2d 602, 606 (CA7 1941). Other times they used words such as "s......
  • Dickinson v Zurko
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 10, 1999
    ...275 (CA2 1942), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 786 (1943); Hall v. Commissioner, 128 F.2d 180, 182 (CA7 1942); First National Bank of Memphis v. Commissioner, 125 F.2d 157 (CA6 1942) (per curiam); NLRB v. Algoma Plywood & Veneer Co., 121 F.2d 602, 606 (CA7 1941). Other times they used words such as......
  • EB Muller & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • April 13, 1944
    ...conclusive unless the record shows that they are clearly erroneous applies to findings based upon expert testimony, First National Bank v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 125 F.2d 157, and the Commission is not bound to accept the opinion of petitioners' accountants. Helvering v. National Grocery Co.......
  • Miller v. United States, 12708.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • August 3, 1956
    ...notes in controversy at the time the notes were received by the taxpayer. Nor is our opinion in First National Bank of Memphis v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 125 F.2d 157, contrary to our present pronouncements. In that case, we pointed out that in its evaluation of real estat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT