First State Bank of Floodwood v. Jubie
Decision Date | 23 October 1993 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 5-91-86. |
Citation | 847 F. Supp. 695 |
Parties | FIRST STATE BANK OF FLOODWOOD, Floodwood Agency, Inc., John F. Schilling, William J. Gravell, Joseph Bullyan and Eugene J. Stowell, Plaintiffs, v. Jerry J. JUBIE, Irene M. Jubie, Kirk M. Suonvieri, Janine I. Suonvieri, Todd Jubie, Thomas Jubie, Kathie Jubie and Timothy Jubie, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota |
John F. Bonner, III, Parsinen, Bowman & Levy, Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiffs.
Keith M. Brownell, Brownell Law Office, Duluth, MN, for defendants.
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to the consent of the parties as authorized by Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3), upon the Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in the following respects:
In addition, the Plaintiffs seek an award of their reasonable costs and attorneys' fees as would be permitted by Minnesota Statutes Sections 325F.68 through .70 and Section 8.31.
At a Hearing on the Motions, the Plaintiffs appeared by John F. Bonner III, Esq., and the Defendants appeared by Keith M. Brownell, Esq.
For reasons which follow, we grant the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Second of the Defendants' Counterclaims, while the remainder of the Plaintiffs' Motions are denied.
On October 9, 1988, Jerry J. and Irene M. Jubie ("Jubies"), both individually and as the sole shareholders of Floodwood Agency, Inc.,2 entered into a Purchase Agreement with John F. Schilling ("Schilling"), William Gravelle ("Gravelle") and certain assignees, for the sale of all of the then available outstanding common stock of the First State Bank of Floodwood ("Bank"). The buyers agreed to pay the sum of 95% of the book value of the common shares if the Sellers owned 100% of the Bank's stock at the time of sale. The book value of the stock, as defined by the terms of the Agreement, was to be determined on or before October 30, 1987.
As pertinent to the issues presented by the Plaintiffs' Motions, the Purchase Agreement contained the following recitals3:
The record before the Court establishes that both parties to this Agreement were represented by legal counsel.4
Due to delays in obtaining the approvals of the applicable State and Federal regulatory agencies, the parties5 entered an "Addendum to Purchase Agreement" on July 28, 1988, which modified the terms and conditions of the sale of the Bank.6 Among its other recitals, the Addendum established the purchase price of the Bank at $528,582.00, which was 95% of the book value of the Bank, as disclosed by the Bank's financial statements for the period ending as of June 30, 1988. The stated purchase price was subject to certain adjustments including the "usual and customary month-end adjustments as made by the Jubies' accountant, Al Skur, whose judgment BUYERS would accept as to those adjustments."
In addition, Paragraph 4 of the Addendum provided in pertinent part:
Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph 14 of the original Purchase Agreement, certain of the family loans were either paid-off, paid-down, or were guaranteed for payment by the Jubies. In this respect, Paragraph 6 of the Addendum provided in part:
6. The SELLERS hereby pledge and offer as security to the BUYERS and the BANK any an all sums owing to the SELLERS pursuant to that certain Retirement Agreement attached to the Agreement of the 9th day of October, 1987 (Exhibit A). Said pledge and security is offered for complete compliance of all of the covenants,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kovatovich v. K-Mart Corp.
...play dominant roles,' we decline to rest our denial of Summary Judgment solely upon that ground." First State Bank of Floodwood v. Jubie, 847 F.Supp. 695, 705-06 (D.Minn.1993), quoting Pfizer Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 185 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 104......
-
First State Bank of Floodwood v. Jubie
...1 In a different context, we have recounted the underlying facts of this case somewhat exhaustively. See, First State Bank of Floodwood v. Jubie, 847 F.Supp. 695, 697-703 (D.Minn.1993). While that recitation was related to the parties' Motions for Summary Judgment, with but minor exception,......