First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. United States
Decision Date | 09 June 1936 |
Docket Number | No. 2809.,2809. |
Citation | 15 F. Supp. 634 |
Parties | FIRST TRUST CO. OF ST. PAUL v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota |
Kellogg, Morgan, Chase, Carter & Headley, of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff.
George F. Sullivan, U. S. Atty., and Linus J. Hammond, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of St. Paul, Minn.
This suit was brought to recover the sum of $500 paid by the plaintiff to the defendant as a jeopardy assessment on November 23, 1934, pursuant to "Notice and Demand for Taxes" dated November 14, 1934.
The assessment was made pursuant to Schedule A2 of title 8 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (section 800 et seq.), section 722(a) of the Revenue Act of 1932 (26 U.S.C.A. § 900 note), which provides as follows:
Prior to November 5, 1930, Northwestern Trust Company and Merchants Trust Company were trust companies in St. Paul, Minn., duly incorporated under the Minnesota laws: On April 8, 1925, Minnesota enacted chapter 156, Session Laws of Minnesota for 1925, which is also found as sections 7699-5 to 7699-11, Mason's Minn. St.1927. This statute authorizes (section 7699-5) any two or more trust companies operating in the same city or village to consolidate into a consolidated trust company and provides all such consolidation shall be effected in the manner provided in the statute.
Section 7699-6 authorizes the respective boards of directors of such consolidating corporations by a majority vote of all their members to agree upon such consolidation and to prescribe the terms and conditions thereof; mode of carrying it into effect; the authorized capital stock of the consolidated corporation, which shall not exceed the aggregate authorized capital stock of all the corporations that are parties thereto; and the name of the consolidated corporation.
Section 7699-7 provides that the consolidated agreement shall be submitted to the superintendent of banks for his approval and shall not be effective until so approved by him.
Section 7699-8 provides that, either before or after such consolidated agreement has been approved by the superintendent of banks, it shall be submitted to the stockholders of each of such corporations at a meeting thereof called for such purpose, and that it shall not become binding upon such corporation until it shall have been approved at each of said meetings by the vote or ballot of the stockholders holding at least a majority of the stock of the respective corporations. A provision is also made whereby any dissenting stockholder may have his stock appraised and require the new corporation to pay him such appraised value. Section 7699-11.
Section 7699-9 provides:
Pursuant to this agreement of consolidation each of the old companies conveyed all of its assets to the consolidated trust company, and the stockholders of each company surrendered their stock and received from the new corporation stock of that corporation, as stipulated in the agreement of consolidation.
The agreement provided that the name of the consolidated company should be the First Trust Company of St. Paul, that the authorized capital stock of the consolidated company should be 10,000 shares of $100 each; that of these 10,000 shares, 8,000 should be issued and distributed to the stockholders of the Merchant Trust Company, St. Paul, share for share, and that 2,000 thereof should be issued and distributed to the stockholders of the Northwestern Trust Company, at the rate of 1 share for 5; that each...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank v. United States
...the effect of § 34a of the National Banking Act, and is not authority decisive of the issues here. Nor is First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. United States, 15 F.Supp. 634 (D.C.Minn. 1936), authority contrary to the taxpayer's position here. That case rejected as binding upon federal taxing auth......
-
Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank v. United States
...requirements. In the decided cases, there is very little to guide us. Our conclusion finds some support in First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. United States, D.C.Minn., 15 F.Supp. 634. There, state financial institutions were merged under a state statute providing that the corporate existence of......
-
McMurray v. Security Bank of Lynnwood
...national bank, and by the charter and bylaws of the resulting state or national bank.' As pointed out in First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. United States, D.C., 15 F.Supp. 634 (1936), the purpose of such a provision is to secure to the new or resulting corporation succession to those properties......