Fisher v. Fisher, No. 1998-CA-01795-SCT

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
Citation771 So.2d 364
Docket Number No. 1998-CA-01795-SCT, No. 97-CA-00837-SCT.
PartiesLealve FISHER v. Earnest J. FISHER. Lealve Fisher v. Earnest J. Fisher.
Decision Date16 November 2000

771 So.2d 364

Lealve FISHER
v.
Earnest J. FISHER. Lealve Fisher
v.
Earnest J. Fisher

Nos. 1998-CA-01795-SCT, 97-CA-00837-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

November 16, 2000.


771 So.2d 365
Jessie L. Evans, Canton, Attorney for Appellant

Sharon Patterson Thibodeaux, Jackson, Attorney for Appellee.

EN BANC.

COBB, Justice, for the Court:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

¶ 1. Earnest J. Fisher filed for a divorce, temporary restraining order and other temporary relief from her husband of 29 years, Lealve Fisher. Mrs. Fisher alleged as her grounds for divorce habitual cruel and inhuman treatment, adultery, and irreconcilable differences. Temporary relief was granted to Mrs. Fisher, and Mr. Fisher counterclaimed for divorce. The chancellor granted Mrs. Fisher a divorce on the ground of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment due to the physical abuse by Mr. Fisher and his extramarital affairs throughout the course of the marriage. Mr. Fisher filed a motion to clarify the judgment of divorce, which Mrs. Fisher answered counterclaiming for contempt for his failure to pay sums then due under the judgment. A postponement of a hearing on the motion was allowed in order to give the parties an opportunity to obtain certain information for the chancellor. Mr. Fisher filed a notice of appeal, and Mrs. Fisher filed a motion to dismiss because the trial court had not ruled on all of the issues. This Court granted the motion and dismissed the appeal without prejudice. Following a hearing on Mr. Fisher's

771 So.2d 366
motion to clarify, the trial court denied that motion. A notice of appeal to this Court from the final judgment was timely filed, assigning as error the following three issues
I. THE CHANCELLOR ERRED IN GRANTING A DIVORCE TO APPELLEE ON THE GROUND OF HABITUAL CRUEL AND INHUMAN TREATMENT.
II. THE CHANCELLOR COMMITTED MANIFEST ERROR IN AWARDING ONE HALF OF APPELLANT'S RAILROAD RETIREMENT TO APPELLEE, IN REQUIRING APPELLANT TO PAY THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER MONTH AS A UTILITY ALLOWANCE, AND IN THE GENERAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE ASSETS ACCUMULATED DURING THE MARRIAGE OF THE PARTIES.
III. THE CHANCELLOR COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN AWARDING USE AND POSSESSION OF THE PARTIES' MARITAL DOMICILE TO APPELLEE UNCONDITIONALLY AND BY FURTHER REQUIRING APPELLANT TO PAY THE MONTHLY HOUSE NOTE ON SAID DOMICILE WITHOUT GIVING APPELLANT ANY INCREASE IN HIS EQUITY IN SAID DOMICILE.

¶ 2. We remand to the trial court for the limited purpose of having the chancellor make the required record of the findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the distribution of the marital estate.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

¶ 3. Earnest and Lealve Fisher were married on July 5, 1968, and had three children, two of whom were still living, grown and married at the time of the divorce. Mr. Fisher had worked for Illinois Central Railroad for 16 years during the marriage, and he had been laid off about 6 years from that job. He worked a short period of time for J.B. Hunt and 5 years for Southern Drayage as a truck driver, and in 1996, he began driving a truck for Jitney Jungle.

¶ 4. Mrs. Fisher had been employed as a crossing guard with the Jackson Police Department for 15 years and also at Jackson Academy for 1½ years. She had worked at various other jobs providing services such as baby sitting, personal care needs of a family member, cleaning, flower arranging and assisting with weddings at her church.

¶ 5. The parties bought a home in 1971 and resided in this domicile together until their final separation in August 1996. Five years before their final separation the parties had been sleeping in separate bedrooms. Mrs. Fisher alleged that her husband would stay out late at night, and when she tried to refuse him entry into the home he would shove her out of the way. Mr. Fisher began sleeping on the couch and moved to a spare bedroom when one of the daughters moved out. Both parties had locks on their bedrooms, and Mr. Fisher had even put a refrigerator in his room. One night after he came in late, and Mrs. Fisher was questioning him about where he had been, she picked up a screwdriver and demanded that he tell her who he had been with. She testified that he grabbed her, hit her "up side" the head and that after she fell to the floor he kicked her. Mr. Fisher alleged that he hit his wife in self-defense. Mrs. Fisher also testified that she had seen the defendant with other women on several occasions, but Mr. Fisher denied the allegations of adultery.

¶ 6. After hearing the testimony of all parties, and having weighed the credibility of the witnesses before the court, the chancellor found that Mr. Fisher had committed adultery, and had been habitually cruel and inhuman in his treatment of his wife.

771 So.2d 367
Accordingly, the chancellor awarded the divorce on the ground of
habitual cruel and inhuman treatment, finding that the habitual treatment shall also include the manner and the relationships which Mr. Fisher had with the three other witnesses, ... that—again, the Court finds that there is sufficient grounds for uncondoned adultery, but can only award a divorce on one particular ground, and the ground is habitual cruel and inhuman treatment, with the Court having considered the treatment of the extramarital affairs and the adulterous relationship that Mr. Fisher has convinced this Court that he has had throughout the course of the marriage and specifically since the filing of the second divorce. And
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
50 practice notes
  • Ellison v. Meek, No. 2001-CA-00834-COA.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Mississippi
    • June 18, 2002
    ...fact, evaluates the sufficiency of the proof based on the credibility of witnesses and the weight of their testimony." Fisher v. Fisher, 771 So.2d 364, 367 (Miss.2000) (citing Richard v. Richard, 711 So.2d 884, 888 (Miss.1998)). A chancellor's findings will not be disturbed upon review by t......
  • Mosley v. Mosley, No. 1999-CA-01920-SCT.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • April 19, 2001
    ...decision as to whether to award attorney's fees in a divorce case is within the sound discretion of the chancellor." Fisher v. Fisher, 771 So.2d 364, 369 (Miss.2000) (citing Grogan v. Grogan, 641 So.2d 734, 744 (Miss.1994)). In her opinion, the chancellor stated that "[p]art of the attorney......
  • Snoddy v. Snoddy, No. 1999-CA-01102-COA.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Mississippi
    • July 31, 2001
    ...fact, evaluates the sufficiency of the proof based on the credibility of witnesses and the weight of their testimony." Fisher v. Fisher, 771 So.2d 364, 367 (Miss.2000) (citing Richard v. Richard, 711 So.2d 884, 888 (Miss.1998)). A chancellor's findings will not be disturbed upon review by t......
  • Peters v. Peters, No. 2003-CA-01907-COA.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Mississippi
    • December 7, 2004
    ...v. Southerland, 875 So.2d 204, 206(¶ 5) (Miss.2004) (citing Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick, 732 So.2d 876, 880 (Miss.1999)); Fisher v. Fisher, 771 So.2d 364, 367(¶ 8) (Miss.2000); Chamblee v. Chamblee, 637 So.2d 850, 859 (Miss.1994). The sufficiency of the evidence is determined by the chancellor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
50 cases
  • Ellison v. Meek, No. 2001-CA-00834-COA.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Mississippi
    • June 18, 2002
    ...fact, evaluates the sufficiency of the proof based on the credibility of witnesses and the weight of their testimony." Fisher v. Fisher, 771 So.2d 364, 367 (Miss.2000) (citing Richard v. Richard, 711 So.2d 884, 888 (Miss.1998)). A chancellor's findings will not be disturbed upon review by t......
  • Mosley v. Mosley, No. 1999-CA-01920-SCT.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • April 19, 2001
    ...decision as to whether to award attorney's fees in a divorce case is within the sound discretion of the chancellor." Fisher v. Fisher, 771 So.2d 364, 369 (Miss.2000) (citing Grogan v. Grogan, 641 So.2d 734, 744 (Miss.1994)). In her opinion, the chancellor stated that "[p]art of the attorney......
  • Snoddy v. Snoddy, No. 1999-CA-01102-COA.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Mississippi
    • July 31, 2001
    ...fact, evaluates the sufficiency of the proof based on the credibility of witnesses and the weight of their testimony." Fisher v. Fisher, 771 So.2d 364, 367 (Miss.2000) (citing Richard v. Richard, 711 So.2d 884, 888 (Miss.1998)). A chancellor's findings will not be disturbed upon review by t......
  • Peters v. Peters, No. 2003-CA-01907-COA.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Mississippi
    • December 7, 2004
    ...v. Southerland, 875 So.2d 204, 206(¶ 5) (Miss.2004) (citing Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick, 732 So.2d 876, 880 (Miss.1999)); Fisher v. Fisher, 771 So.2d 364, 367(¶ 8) (Miss.2000); Chamblee v. Chamblee, 637 So.2d 850, 859 (Miss.1994). The sufficiency of the evidence is determined by the chancellor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT