Fisher v. Norman Apartments, Inc.
| Decision Date | 21 June 1937 |
| Docket Number | 13963. |
| Citation | Fisher v. Norman Apartments, Inc., 101 Colo. 173, 72 P.2d 1092 (Colo. 1937) |
| Parties | FISHER v. NORMAN APARTMENTS, Inc. COLORADO NAT. BANK OF DENVER et al., Garnishees (HOLMAN et al., Interveners). |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 1937.
Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; James C Starkweather, Judge.
Action by B. B. Fisher, assignee of the George Tritch Hardware Company, against Norman Apartments, Incorporated, in which the Colorado National Bank of Denver, Colo., and another were summoned as garnishees and in which C. L. Holman and others intervened. From a judgment in favor of the garnishees and interveners, plaintiff brings error.
Reversed and remanded.
A Irving Sobol and A. R. Morrison, both of Denver, for plaintiffs in error.
Bartels, Blood & Bancroft, of Denver, for defendants in error except Norman Apartments, Inc.
The plaintiff in error, herein referred to as Fisher, or the judgment creditor, is the assignee of a judgment rendered in favor of the Tritch Hardware Company against Norman Apartments, Inc. Fisher procured execution to be issued on the judgment and caused garnishee summons to be served on one B. F. Englander and the Colorado National Bank as garnishees. All of the interrogatories propounded in the summons were answered by the garnishees in the negative. Fisher traversed the answers. The International Trust Company filed a petition in intervention claiming the 'credits, issues, debts choses in action and other personal property' with which the Colorado National Bank of Denver and B. F. Englander as garnishees are sought by the plaintiff herein to be charged.
From a judgment on the traverse in favor of the garnishees and on the petition in intervention in favor of the trust company, Fisher prosecutes this writ of error.
A chronology of the transactions preceding and subsequent to the garnishment is necessary to an understanding of the issues involved and to a determination of the applicable legal principles.
(1) August 15, 1923, William N. Bowman and Alice M. Bowman executed a deed of trust to the International Trust Company covering certain property on which the Norman Apartments now are located securing a bond issue of $350,000.
(2) October 12, 1923, the Bowmans by warranty deed, recorded November 12, 1923, conveyed the property covered by the deed of trust to the Norman Apartments, Inc., which assumed and agreed to pay the encumbrance.
(3) September 4, 1931, the Tritch Hardware Company secured the judgment against the Norman Apartments, Inc., on which the summons in garnishment issued.
(4) October 12, 1932, an agreement, hereinafter set out at length, was entered into between the Bowmans, the Norman Apartments, Inc., and certain persons constituting a 'bondholders' protective committee,' which is herein referred to as the bondholders' committee.
(5) November 1, 1932, the trust company on the request of the bondholders' committee--holders of more than one-third of all the bonds then outstanding--declared all of the unpaid bonds secured by said deed of trust to be due and payable immediately.
(6) November 28, 1932, a foreclosure suit was instituted by the trust company, against the Bowmans, the Norman Apartments, Inc., the members of the bondholders' committee, and unknown persons consisting of the unknown holders of outstanding bonds.
(7) November 28, 1932, notice of lis pendens was filed in the office of the county clerk and recorder.
(8) July 15, 1935, the bondholders' committee filed its answer setting up that the committee had been in possession of the Norman Apartments under and by virtue of the contract of October 12, 1932, and offering to account for all moneys unexpended deposited from October 12, 1932, in the Colorado National Bank subject to being paid out as provided in said contract.
(9) July 15, 1935, the court entered a decree of foreclosure.
(10) July 31, 1935, the judgment of the Tritch Hardware Company was assigned to Fisher.
(11) September 17, 1935, execution issued on that judgment.
(12) September 18, 1935, the garnishee summons above mentioned were served.
(13) November 26, 1935, the order confirming the sale was entered.
Following the order of sale of July 15, the Norman Apartments, Inc., filed a petition in bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court temporarily enjoined further proceedings, but afterwards dissolved the restraining order and permitted the sale. On petition of the International Trust Company and the bondholders' committee, the bankruptcy court, on January 23, 1936, authorized the bondholders' committee to pay to the International Trust Company as trustee under the deed of trust the moneys on deposit in the Colorado National Bank sought to be reached by Fisher by garnishment.
The trust deed executed by the Bowmans after describing the real estate contained the following: 'Together with any and all buildings, improvements and appurtenances now and at any time hereafter constructed or placed upon said land or any part thereof, * * * together with all the rents, uses and privileges thereof, which are hereby assigned, * * * and together with all and singular the personal property of every kind and nature whatsoever contained or hereafter contained in said building or buildings, and used or to be used in connection with the carrying on of an hotel business in said building or buildings.'
The contract of October 12, 1932, was in words as follows:
checks drawn on the funds deposited with said depository hereinabove referred to.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Martinez v. Continental Enterprises
...possession of the property or may apply for appointment of a receiver to collect and impound the rents. Fisher v. Norman Apartments, Inc., 101 Colo. 173, 72 P.2d 1092 (1937). However, until the mortgagee takes some effectual step to subject the rents to the payment of the debt, such as by g......
-
In re Morning Star Ranch Resorts, Bankruptcy No. 86 B 7192 C
...Central States Life Insurance Co. v. Carlson, 98 F.2d 102, 105 (10th Cir.1938), In re Colter, supra at 512; Fisher v. Norman Apartments, 101 Colo. 173, 72 P.2d 1092, 1097 (Colo.1937); Moncrieff v. Hare, supra at 1085; Application of Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co., supra at A receiver is ......
- State v. Miller
-
In re Colter, Inc., Bankruptcy No. 84 B 4564 G to 84 B 4567 J
...his lien, such as taking physical possession of the rented premises or requesting the appointment of a receiver. Fischer v. Norman Apartments, 101 Colo. 173, 72 P.2d 1092 (1937). Prior to the taking of such affirmative steps, the rents are subject to divestment by the levy of a judgment lie......