Fisher v. Provin
Court | Supreme Court of Michigan |
Citation | 25 Mich. 347 |
Decision Date | 13 July 1872 |
Parties | Jane Fisher v. Margaret Provin |
25 Mich. 347
Jane Fisher
v.
Margaret Provin
Supreme Court of Michigan
July 13, 1872
Heard July 13, 1872 [25 Mich. 348] [Syllabus Material] [25 Mich. 349] [Syllabus Material] [25 Mich. 350]
Appeal in Chancery from Ionia Circuit.
This was a bill filed by Jane Fisher, to quiet title to the lands described therein. The facts in the case were agreed upon by stipulation, as follows, viz.:
"That on the 22d day of June, 1855, Frederick Hall, of Ionia, Michigan, was the owner in fee of the lands described in the bill of complaint in this cause, and that on that day, Frederick Hall, together with Ann Hall, his wife, by warranty deed, duly executed and delivered, conveyed said lands in fee, to one Wilber Fisher, and the complainant in this cause; and that at the time of said conveyance the said Wilber Fisher, and the complainant were husband and wife, and as grantees in said deed of conveyance they were named and described as follows: 'To Wilber Fisher and Jane Fisher, his wife, of Ionia, Michigan, their heirs and assigns forever.' And that under this conveyance the said Wilber Fisher and the complainant, entered and were seized in fee simple, and continued so seized until the death of the said Wilber Fisher, who died on the 9th day of May, 1861; that since which time the said complainant has been in actual possession of said lands and premises, claiming title thereto.
"And that on the 16th day of July, 1862, Devilo L. Fisher, being the son of said Wilber Fisher and the said complainant, and the only heir-at-law of said Wilber Fisher, for a good and sufficient consideration, duly executed and delivered to one Mary A. Thomas, a sister of the said defendant, a quit-claim deed of said lands, and that said Mary A. Thomas, on the 18th day of July, 1862, for a good and sufficient consideration, duly executed and delivered to the defendant in this cause, a quit-claim deed of said lands, and that all of the deeds herein mentioned were duly recorded in the office of the register of deeds of the county of Ionia, as mentioned and set forth in the bill of complaint in this cause, and that said defendant claims title in fee to the undivided half of said lands, by virtue of said quit-claim deeds of conveyance, and that the complainant claims title in fee of all of said lands, as survivor, by virtue of said conveyance from Hall and wife to herself and husband."
The decree below was as follows, viz.:
"That the said complainant, Jane Fisher, is the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Spears, No. HT 03-00738.
...itself, which, being directly repugnant to both the letter and the spirit of these enactments, no longer exists. Fisher v. Provin, 25 Mich. 347, 349 The modern conception of entireties property is more akin to a joint tenancy in which both parties control the alienation of the fee interest ......
-
Morgan v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., Docket No. 63465
...the tenancy by the entireties was not affected by the married women's acts and continued to exist as at common law. See Fisher v. Provin, 25 Mich. 347 (1872); Morrill v. Morrill, 138 Mich. 112, 101 N.W. 209 (1904); Arrand v. Graham, 297 Mich. 559, 298 N.W. 281, 300 N.W. 16 (1941); Schram v.......
-
Olson v. Parker (In re Parker), Case No. HM 05-91271
...doctrine itself, which, being directly repugnant to both the letter and the spirit of these enactments, no longer exists.Fisher v. Provin, 25 Mich. 347, 349, 1872 WL 5989 at *2 (1872) (emphasis added).The Michigan entireties estate today is more akin to a joint tenancy in which both husband......
-
Schram v. Burt, No. 8069.
...the fundamentals of the common law estate, though they have materially affected the incident of the husband's control. Fisher v. Provin, 25 Mich. 347; Dickey v. Converse, 117 Mich. 449, 76 N.W. 80, 72 Am.St.Rep. 568; Morrill v. Morrill, 138 Mich. 112, 101 N.W. 209, 110 Am.St.Rep. 306, 4 Ann......