Fitzgerald v. Sanford

Decision Date05 June 1944
Docket NumberNo. 10828.,10828.
Citation142 F.2d 445
PartiesFITZGERALD v. SANFORD, Warden.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Thomas Fitzgerald, in pro. per.

M. Neil Andrews, U. S. Atty., and Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before SIBLEY, McCORD, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The complaint on habeas corpus is that appellant was ill before and at the time of his trial, that the trial was unduly delayed, that he was not granted process to get at government's expense witnesses in confinement across the continent at Alcatraz and McNeils Island prisons; and that though counsel was appointed for him the counsel advised him to plead guilty and obtain four years of imprisonment, the prosecution contending for eight years, and the law authorizing twenty-five years. A plea of guilty entered under those circumstances was not under such duress as to make it and the sentence pronounced upon it void in a collateral attack upon it. The witnesses desired were outside the district and far beyond 100 miles, and no law provided for getting them at the expense of the government. 28 U.S.C.A. § 656. The refusal, if wrong, would be remediable by appeal and not by habeas corpus. The judgment discharging the writ is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • White v. State of SC, Civ. A. No. 3:87-2578-15(B).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • 30 Enero 1989
    ...an appropriate device for reviewing compulsory process claims, Brewer v. Hunter, 163 F.2d 341, 342 (10th Cir.1947), Fitzgerald v. Sanford, 142 F.2d 445, 446 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 806, 65 S.Ct. 311, 89 L.Ed. 643 (1944), Ex parte Smith, 72 F.Supp. 935, 942 (M.D.Pa.1947), courts h......
  • Thor v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 30 Mayo 1978
    ...device for reviewing compulsory process claims; see, e. g., Brewer v. Hunter, 10 Cir. 1947, 163 F.2d 341, 342; Fitzgerald v. Sanford, 5 Cir. 1944, 142 F.2d 445, 446, cert. denied, 323 U.S. 806, 65 S.Ct. 311, 89 L.Ed. 643; Ex Parte Smith, M.D.Pa.1947, 72 F.Supp. 935, The right of defendants ......
  • Brewer v. Hunter, 3478.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 28 Julio 1947
    ...F.2d 314, 315. Furthermore, the ruling of the trial court on the motion cannot be questioned in habeas corpus proceedings. Fitzgerald v. Sanford, 5 Cir., 142 F.2d 445. Although petitioner was represented by counsel throughout the entire proceedings in the sentencing court, the question of h......
  • Ex parte Smith
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania
    • 7 Agosto 1947
    ...73 App.D.C. 174, 118 F.2d 375, certiorari denied Ruben v. United States, 315 U.S. 798, 62 S.Ct. 580, 86 L.Ed. 1199. 43 Fitzgerald v. Sanford, 5 Cir., 142 F. 2d 445. 44 Smith v. Squier, 9 Cir., 1943, 136 F. 2d 536, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 774, 64 S.Ct. 85, 88 L.Ed. 45 Robinson v. United S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT