Fitzhugh v. Levee District

CourtArkansas Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM.
CitationFitzhugh v. Levee District, 15 S.W. 455, 54 Ark. 224 (Ark. 1891)
Decision Date21 February 1891
PartiesFITZHUGH v. LEVEE DISTRICT

APPEAL from Phillips Circuit Court in chancery, M. T. SANDERS, Judge.

The Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 of Phillips county, instituted proceedings in equity to charge the lands of Fitzhugh and wife for levee taxes assessed against the lands, in pursuance of chapter 95 of Mansfield's Digest. Defendants set up a counter-claim that, before the construction of the levee for which the assessment was made, they had built a private levee, of which plaintiff had taken possession without their consent and without payment. For its value they asked judgment.

Testimony was introduced to show the value of the private levee. The court disallowed the counter-claim, and rendered a decree for the amount claimed in the complaint.

Affirmed.

Palmer & Nichols for appellant.

The court erred in ignoring the counter-claim. Appellants were entitled to compensation for their levee. Hare on Cont., p. 233; 3 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law, 860; 3 N.H. 384; 1 Chitty on Cont., 79, et seq.; 2 Addison on Cont., 584; 1 id., 53-4; 2 Wharton on Cont., sec. 708; 1 Story on Cont., secs. 11, 12, 12a; 8 Ark. 202; 55 Vt. 417; 144 Mass. 65; Anderson, Dict., 248.

Stephenson & Trieber and P. O. Thweatt, for appellee.

These special assessments are really nothing but taxes. 21 Ark. 40; 53 Wis. 178; Cooley, Tax., 416; 52 Ark. 356; Mansf. Dig., sec. 4378; Acts 1887, chap. 95. Taxes cannot be made the subject of set-off or counter-claim; 50 Ark. 384; 32 id., 414.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The appellant concedes the right of the levee district to collect the amount assessed against his lands. His only contention is that he is entitled to set-off against the assessment a claim which he asserts against the district. The statute which authorizes the proceeding for raising a fund to pay for levees built in pursuance of its authority, does not provide for nor contemplate that character of relief. The assessment must be paid without regard to any claim for compensation which the appellant may have against the district.

Affirm.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Stone v. Rottman
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 2, 1904
  • Iby v. Southern Building & Loan Association
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1899
    ...496. No set-off could properly be pleaded in a suit to foreclose a mortgage. 22 Ark. 227, 228; 40 Ark. 75; 14 N.J.Eq. 467; 32 id. 225; 54 Ark. 224. BUNN, C. J. This was originally a bill to enjoin the sale of certain mortgaged real estate in Black Rock, Lawrence county, because of certain d......
  • Casey v. Trout
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 12, 1914
    ... ... against Jacob Trout, et al., to collect an improvement ... district assessment on certain real estate ...          Appellees ... defended on the ground ... ...
  • West v. Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1915
    ...to levy the tax. The levee has never been completed. Kirby's Dig., §§ 4927-4938-4961; 53 A. 728; 32 S.E. 349; 49 A. 518; 14 N.E. 600; 54 Ark. 224. J. KIRBY, J., dissents. OPINION HART, J., (after stating the facts). Section 4941 of Kirby's Digest provides that the board of directors shall c......
  • Get Started for Free