Flaherty v. N.Y., N. H. & H. R. Co.

• Decision Date: 24 July 1896
• Citation: Flaherty v. N.Y., N. H. & H. R. Co., 35 A. 308 (R.I. 1896)
• Parties: FLAHERTY v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO.
• Court: Rhode Island Supreme Court

35 A. 308

FLAHERTY

v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

July 24, 1896.

Action by Martin Flaherty against the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company for damages for the death of a son. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant petitions for a new trial. Granted.

Walter B. Vincent and Dennis H. Sheahan, for plaintiff.

Frank S. Arnold, for defendant.

PER CURIAM. We are of the opinion that the principles of the decisions in Whipple v Railroad Co. (R. I.) 35 Atl. 305, and Crandall v. Railroad Co., Id. 307, are decisive of the right of the plaintiff to maintain his action. We think, however, that the damages awarded are excessive. The deceased was 22 years of age. The sums which the plaintiff had received from him had been almost wholly while he was living at home, and during his minority. We do not think that the probability of the continued receipt of moneys by the plaintiff from the deceased, when it is considered that he had attained his majority, and left home, and that he was but one of a family of eight...