Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.
Decision Date | 11 July 1904 |
Citation | 77 P. 485,45 Or. 335 |
Parties | FLANAGAN ESTATE v. GREAT CENT. LAND CO. et al. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Coos County; J.W. Hamilton, Judge.
Suit by the Flanagan Estate, a corporation, against the Great Central Land Company and another. From a decree for plaintiff, the land company appeals. Modified.
On July 25, 1902, Florence Sheridan and others, being the sole heirs at law of Patrick Flanagan, deceased, gave to one H Sengstacken the following agreement in writing: Sengstacken paid the $1,000 on the day of the execution of the agreement. On August 2, 1902, he assigned and set over to the defendant, the Great Central Land Company, a corporation all his interest in the agreement, which company has since continued to be the owner and holder thereof. Later, the company paid to the Flanagan & Bennett Bank, to the credit and subject to the order of the vendors in the agreement, 25 per cent. of the remaining $49,000, being $12,250, whereupon, on August 20, 1902, the vendors executed, in accordance with the terms of their undertaking, a deed to the land company for the premises designated, and delivered the same to the Flanagan & Bennett Bank, to be delivered to said company when the stipulated payments of that which remained due of the purchase price were made. The plaintiff, the Flanagan Estate, was subsequently duly incorporated and organized by the vendors, who became and were the owners of the entire stock thereof, and on September 30th they conveyed the premises in question to the corporation, but subject to the contract of sale or agreement above set forth, and the conveyance to the Great Central Land Company, evidenced by the deed deposited in escrow with the Flanagan & Bennett Bank, and transferred and set over unto it all their right, title, and interest in and to the contract. The land company having failed to make payment of the additional 50 per cent. of the $49,000 on or prior to the 25th day of July, 1903, the plaintiff, at 12 o'clock p.m. of that day, by notice to the land company, declared the contract forfeited, and demanded of the Flanagan & Bennett Bank a return of the deed held by it in escrow, the demand being at once complied with. This suit was instituted to obtain a strict foreclosure of the contract of sale or agreement. Two defenses were interposed: (1) That defendant, the Great Central Land Company, was entitled until August 4, 1903, to make the second payment, but was precluded therefrom by plaintiff's previous declaration of forfeiture and withdrawal of the escrow, contrary to the stipulations of the contract; and (2) that the vendors have since the execution of the contract conveyed all their interest in the premises to the plaintiff, which company has failed and neglected to execute and deposit with the Flanagan & Bennett Bank a deed conveying the same to the land company. The trial court decreed a strict foreclosure, and the defendant, the Great Central Land Company, appeals.
E.B. Seabrook, for appellant.
J.W. Bennett, for respondent.
WOLVERTON J. (after stating the facts).
The first contention in logical order to be noticed is that the forfeiture was prematurely declared, it being insisted by counsel for the defendant land company that the third payment of 50 per cent. of the $49,000 remaining of the purchase price after the payment of the $1,000 was not then due and payable. The position depends upon the proper interpretation of the contract, the plaintiff contending that the payment in question fell due July 25, 1903. The agreement or contract, as will be noticed, provides that Sengstacken shall pay on the day which it bears date the sum of $1,000, "and shall within ten (10) days thereafter deposit 25% of ($49,000.00) Forty nine Thousand Dollars, in the Flanagan & Bennett Bank to our credit and subject to our order and shall within one year thereafter deposit in said bank fifty per cent. of said Forty nine Thousand ($49,000.00) Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum." The inquiry centers about the employment of the word "thereafter," where found the second time in the excerpt. Does it bear relation to the date of the contract and that of the payment of the $1,000, or to the date of the deposit of the 25 per cent. of the balance of the purchase price designated? By pursuing the contract further, it will be found that the stipulation touching the last payment is that it shall be made two years after its date, so that all payments save this one are unmistakably fixed with reference to the date of the execution of the contract, and it is highly improbable that the payment in question should have been fixed with reference to some other date. Indeed, a critical reading of the conditions does not seem to us to lead to such a result, and we are firmly of the opinion that the contention is without merit.
It is next insisted that the deed by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Giustina v. United States
...the Oregon Supreme Court. Blackburn v. Maloney, 189 Or. 76, 218 P.2d 459; Panushka v. Panushka, Or., 349 P.2d 450; Flanagan v. Great Central Land Co., 45 Or. 335, 77 P. 485. These cases hold that if the contract is to be treated as the transfer of an interest in real property, the purchaser......
-
Lincoln County v. Fischer
...there has been a waiver. Such is not the case. * * *' In so holding, the court quoted with approval from Flanagan Estate v. Great Central Land Company, 45 Or. 335, 77 P. 485, '* * * While it [equity] might refuse in many instances to interfere for the relief of an obligor against forfeiture......
-
Morrison v. Kandler
...555, 146 P.2d 754; Grider v. Turnbow, supra; McCracken v. Walnut Park Garage, Inc., 156 Or. 697, 68 P.2d 123; and Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co., 45 Or. 335, 77 P. 485. The rule is now well established that the filing of a suit for strict foreclosure is a waiver by the vendor of an......
-
Foulkes v. Sengstacken
... ... Williams was the owner of a tract of land consisting of mud ... flats, which were covered and ... unto John M. Foulkes all the real estate of which the ... testatrix "may die seised." In July, ... of the condition. Flanagan v. Great Cent. Land Co., ... 45 Or. 335, 340, 77 P ... ...