Flermoen v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
Decision Date | 21 May 1991 |
Docket Number | No. 910006,910006 |
Citation | 470 N.W.2d 220 |
Parties | Michael K. FLERMOEN, Appellant, v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKERS COMPENSATION BUREAU, Appellee. Civ. |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
Letnes, Marshall, Fiedler & Clapp, Ltd., Grand Forks, for appellant; argued by Howard D. Swanson. Appearance by Douglas Giegler, 2nd year law student.
Dean J. Haas (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, Bismarck, for appellee.
Michael K. Flermoen appealed from a district court judgment upholding a decision of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau (the Bureau) denying Flermoen's request for benefits. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Flermoen has been employed as a fireman for ten years with the City of Grand Forks. During April 1989, Flermoen was diagnosed as suffering from testicular cancer. He applied for workers compensation benefits, claiming that he developed the disease in the course of his employment as a fireman. Following a hearing, the Bureau denied Flermoen's request for benefits, and from an affirmance of that decision by the district court Flermoen appealed to this court.
A claimant seeking workers compensation benefits from the Bureau has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to participate in the fund. Section 65-01-11, N.D.C.C. However, Section 65-01-02(17)(d), N.D.C.C., creates a limited exception to this general rule:
This statute shifts the burden of proof from the claimant to the Bureau in cases involving specified conditions or impairments of health suffered by a fireman or law enforcement officer. Kroh v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, 425 N.W.2d 899 (N.D.1988). The presumed fact is that the condition was suffered in the line of duty and is not a preexisting disease, and the statute shifts the burden to the Bureau to prove "that the nonexistence of the presumed fact is more probable than its existence." Sunderland v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 370 N.W.2d 549, 552 (N.D.1985).
Occupational cancer was added in 1987 by the Fiftieth Session of the Legislative Assembly (S.L.1987, Ch. 750, Sec. 1) as a condition for which the presumption applies. The Bureau asserts that the presumption of entitlement to benefits does not apply until the claimant establishes that he is suffering from an "occupational cancer" as that term is defined under the statute. Flermoen asserts that if a fireman demonstrates he suffers from any cancer and has been exposed to smoke, fumes, or other carcinogenic substances in the course of his duties as a fireman he is entitled to the statutory presumption that he has a compensable disease.
The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which is fully reviewable by this court. Kim-Go v. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc., 460 N.W.2d 694 (N.D.1990). In construing statutory provisions our duty is to ascertain the intent of the Legislature, which must be sought initially from the statutory language. District 1 Republican Committee v. District 1 Democrat Committee, 466 N.W.2d 820 (N.D.1991). If the language of a statute is clear and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fleck v. ANG Coal Gasification Co.
...we must give meaning to every word, phrase, and sentence. In re J.D., 494 N.W.2d 160 (N.D.1992); Flermoen v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, 470 N.W.2d 220 (N.D.1991). Furthermore, in interpreting a statute we must presume that the Legislature did not intend an absurd or ludicrous......
-
BASF Corp. v. Symington
...Bureau, 484 N.W.2d 292 (N.D.1992). We give meaning, if possible, to every word, phrase, and sentence. Flermoen v. N.D. Workers Compensation Bureau, 470 N.W.2d 220 (N.D.1991). In applying the discovery rule we have used an objective standard for the knowledge requirement; we focus upon wheth......
-
Continental Cas. Co. v. Kinsey
...(N.D.1989). The primary purpose of statutory construction is to ascertain the intent of the Legislature. Flermoen v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation Bureau, 470 N.W.2d 220 (N.D.1991). In determining legislative intent, the court may consider the object sought to be obtained, the statute'......
-
Shiek v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
...617, 618-619 (N.D.1994), we have recognized this is a "limited exception to th[e] general rule." Flermoen v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, 470 N.W.2d 220, 221 (N.D.1991). ¶20 N.D.C.C. § 65-05-09.3 (1993) states an employee who "has retired or voluntarily withdrawn from the labor......