Flick v. Alba, 90-5564

Decision Date06 May 1991
Docket NumberNo. 90-5564,90-5564
Citation932 F.2d 728
PartiesNorman Z. FLICK, Appellant, v. Julie W. ALBA and Peter M. Carlson, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Norman Z. Flick, pro se.

Mary Jo Madigan, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees.

Before ARNOLD, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Norman Z. Flick, an inmate at the Federal Medical Center (FMC) in Rochester, Minnesota, appeals the district court's 1 order granting defendant prison officials' motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Flick filed his Bivens-type complaint against the case manager coordinator and the warden of FMC seeking injunctive relief and damages for their denial of his right of access to the prison's administrative remedy procedure. We conclude that the federal regulations providing for an administrative remedy procedure do not in and of themselves create a liberty interest in access to that procedure. When the claim underlying the administrative grievance involves a constitutional right, the prisoner's right to petition the government for redress is the right of access to the courts, which is not compromised by the prison's refusal to entertain his grievance. See Azeez v. DeRobertis, 568 F.Supp. 8, 10 (N.D.Ill.1982) (although state prison grievance procedures "may be evidence of a parent substantive right, they do not in themselves trigger a protected liberty interest"). 2

Accordingly, we affirm.

1 The Honorable Harry H. MacLaughlin, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2 We note that, in any event, in this case denial of Flick's administrative complaint was in accordance with established procedure.

To continue reading

Request your trial
801 cases
  • Lee v. Driskel, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-874-P
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana
    • 12 Agosto 2016
    ...4/24/00); Brown v. Dodson, et al., 863 F. Supp. 284 (United States District Court, Western District of Virginia 6/2/94); Flick v. Alba, 932 F.2d 728, 729 (8th Cir. 1991). A prison official's failure to comply with a state administrative grievance procedure is not actionable under Section 19......
  • Pryor-El v. Kelly
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • 27 Junio 1995
    ...no entitlement to grievance procedures or access to any such procedure voluntarily established by a state") (citing Flick v. Alba, 932 F.2d 728, 729 (8th Cir.1991); Mann v. Adams, 855 F.2d 639, 640 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898, 109 S.Ct. 242, 102 L.Ed.2d 231 (1988)); see also Spro......
  • Flanagan v. Shively
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 16 Enero 1992
    ...interest. See, e.g. Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 468, 477, 103 S.Ct. 864, 869, 874, 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983) and Flick v. Alba, 932 F.2d 728 (8th Cir.1991), (per curiam), ("Federal regulations providing for an administrative remedy procedure do not in and of themselves create a liberty inter......
  • Hunnicutt v. FNU Desantiago
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • 26 Septiembre 2019
    ...is not compromised by the prison's refusal to entertain his grievance." Boyd v. Werholtz, 443 F. App'x at 332 (quoting Flick v. Alba, 932 F.2d 728, 729 (8th Cir. 1991) ). Hunnicutt's claims that Lea County Correctional officials mishandled the grievance process therefore fail.IV. THE COURT ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT