Flint Elec. Membership Corp. v. Whitworth, s. 94-9199

Citation77 F.3d 1321
Decision Date19 March 1996
Docket Number94-9227,Nos. 94-9199,s. 94-9199
PartiesFLINT ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby WHITWORTH, Individually and in his official capacity as Department of Corrections Commissioner, Clyde Stovall, Individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Commissioner of Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellants, Georgia Power Company, Defendant. PATAULA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby WHITWORTH, Individually and in his official capacity as Department of Corrections Commissioner, Clyde Stovall, Individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Commissioner of Department of Corrections, David C. Evans, Individually, Defendants-Appellants, Georgia Power Company, Defendant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

Michael J. Bowers, State Attorney General, Neal Bradley Childers, William F. Amideo, Atlanta, GA, for appellants in No. 94-9199.

James Allen Orr, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Dulaney L. O'Roark, III, Atlanta, GA, Kathy Renee Bess, FDIC, Legal Div., Atlanta, GA, for appellee in No. 94-9199.

Michael J. Bowers, State Attorney General, Daryl Alan Robinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Neal Bradley Childers, William F. Amideo, for appellants in No. 94-9227.

Robert P. Edwards, Jr., Kevin Charles Greene, Charles Frederick Palmer, Susan P. Wilkerson, Eric A. Szweda, Troutman Sanders, Atlanta, GA, for Georgia Power.

James Allen Orr, Dulaney L. O'Roark, III, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Atlanta, GA, James Elwood Friese, Office of James Elwood Friese, Cuthbert, GA, Kathy Renee Bess, FDIC, Legal Division, Atlanta, GA, for appellee in No. 94-9227.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:90-CV-1550-HTW); Horace T. Ward, Senior District Judge.

Before BARKETT, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON and CLARK, Senior Circuit Judges.

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Our earlier opinion, reported at 68 F.3d 1309, is hereby modified by withdrawing the third sentence of the first full paragraph on page 1313, which states "It has also become evident, in light of McKinney, that the EMCs' procedural due process claims are not ripe for review[,]" and substituting in its place the following:

It has also become evident, in light of McKinney, that the EMCs failed to state a procedural due process claim.

The judgment of the court and the remainder of the opinion are unchanged and remain in full force and effect.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Riley v. Camp, 94-9118
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • December 8, 1997
    ...injustice if implemented." Flint Elec. Membership Corp. v. Whitworth, 68 F.3d 1309, 1312 (11th Cir.1995) (per curiam), modified, 77 F.3d 1321 (1996). The Riley II panel erred in applying the doctrine of law of the case because all three of the foregoing exceptions apply First, the Riley II ......
  • Wax 'n Works v. City of St. Paul
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • October 18, 1999
    ...1983. See, e.g., Flint Electric Membership Corp. v. Whitworth, 68 F.3d 1309, 1313 (11th Cir. 1995) (per curiam), modified, 77 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); Perez-Ruiz v. Crespo-Guillen, 25 F.3d 40, 43 (1st Cir. 1994); New Burnham Prairie Homes, Inc. v. Village of Burnham, 910 F.2......
  • Barr v. Jefferson Cnty. Barber Comm'n
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • April 25, 2017
    ...addressing Ms. Barr's complaints. Flint Elec. Membership Corp. v. Whitworth , 68 F.3d 1309, 1314 n.6 (11th Cir. 1995), modified , 77 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 1996).Accordingly, as Ms. Barr has failed to make out a prima facie claim for a procedural due process violation under Section 1983 again......
  • Jaggars v. City of Sheffield
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • May 21, 2014
    ...a means to remedy the deprivation." Flint Elec. Membership Corp. v. Whitworth, 68 F.3d 1309, 1313 (11th Cir. 1995) modified, 77 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 1996) (quoting McKinney v. Pate, 20 F.3d 1550, 1563 (11th Cir. 1994) (en banc)) (italics in original). Alabama law recognizes in rem actions b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT