Flora Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 7009.
| Decision Date | 27 August 1962 |
| Docket Number | No. 7009.,7009. |
| Parties | FLORA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Wyoming corporation, Appellant, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY; Argus Construction Company, a Wyoming corporation; Flora Construction Company and Argus Construction Company, a joint venture; Walter W. Flora, Mildred L. Flora, William Wagner and J. A. Trethewey, Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Flora Const. Co., appellant, appearing by its President, Walter W. Flora.
Lawrence M. Wood, Denver, Colo., for appellee Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
No appearance for other appellees.
Before PICKETT, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.
Appellee Fireman's Fund Insurance Company brought an action in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado against Flora Construction Company and others. Flora Construction appeared pro se by its president, who is not an attorney at law, and filed a motion for a more definite statement. The trial court held that a corporation may not appear pro se and allowed time for the corporation to secure representation by an attorney at law. Flora Construction moved for reconsideration of this order and, when that motion was denied, filed notice of appeal. Fireman's Fund moves to dismiss the appeal because of the lack of an appealable order.
The record shows no final decision appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and no interlocutory order appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292. The action involves multiple claims and multiple parties and no effort was made to comply with Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. The appeal is dismissed.
In the circumstances we treat the papers presented by Flora Construction as an application for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the district court to permit Flora Construction to appear by its president who admittedly is not an attorney at law. The rule is well established that a corporation can appear in a court of record only by an attorney at law.1 As the action of the trial court was entirely proper, application for mandamus is denied.
1 Osborn v. President, Directors, and Company of the Bank of the United States, 22 U.S. 738, 830, 6 L.Ed. 204; Commercial and Rail Road Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, Richards and Company, 39 U.S. 60, 65, 10 L.Ed. 354; Heiskell v. Mozie, 65 App.D.C. 255, 82 F.2d 861, 863; Acme Poultry Corporation v. United States, 4 Cir., 146 F.2d 738, 740, certiorari denied 324 U.S. 860, 65 S.Ct. 865, 89 L.Ed. 1417; Mullin-Johnson Co. v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Philadelphia, Pa., D.C.N.D.Calif., 9 F.Supp. 175; Brandstein v. White Lamps, D.C.S.D.N.Y., ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Collinsgru v. Palmyra Bd. of Educ., 96-5807
...United States, 818 F.2d 696 (9th Cir.1987); O'Reilly v. New York Times, 692 F.2d 863 (2d Cir.1982). But see Flora Constr. Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 307 F.2d 413 (10th Cir.1962) (denying interlocutory appeal of court's refusal to permit company to appear pro se by its non-attorney pres......
-
Hartland v. Alaska Airlines, s. 72-2531
......, that should be contributed to a common fund for the payment of such common services or the ... a 'practical rather than a technical construction.' Id., at 546 (69 S.Ct., at 1226). The inquiry ...Toledo & Ohio R. Co., 146 U.S. 536, 544-545 (13 S.Ct. 170, 172, 36 ... Flora Constr. Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 307 F.2d ......
-
Devine v. Indian River County School Bd.
...(holds order denying discharge of counsel and request to proceed pro se immediately appealable) with Flora Constr. Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 307 F.2d 413 (10th Cir.1962) (without discussion, holds order denying motion to proceed pro se on behalf of corporation not immediately appealab......
-
Tal v. Hogan
...294 (10th Cir.1966) ("[A] corporation can appear in a court of record only by an attorney at law."); Flora Constr. Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 307 F.2d 413, 414 (10th Cir.1962) ("The rule is well established that a corporation can appear in a court of record only by an attorney at law."......
-
Involuntary Petitions Under the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978
...Regarding corporations, see, DeVilliers v. Atlas Corp., 360 F.2d 292 (10th Cir. 1966); Flora Construction v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 307 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1962), cert. den. 371 U.S. 950 (1963). Regarding partnerships, see, MOVE Organization v. U.S. Department of Justice, 555 F.Supp.......