Florida Harvestore, Inc. v. A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., 76-1869

Decision Date17 October 1977
Docket NumberNo. 76-1869,76-1869
Citation561 F.2d 631
Parties1977-2 Trade Cases 61,679 FLORIDA HARVESTORE, INC. (a corporation), on its own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees Cross-Appellants, v. A. O. SMITH HARVESTORE PRODUCTS INC. (a corporation), Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Dwight Sullivan, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, J. Patrick, Dyal, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Hogan & Hartson, E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., Stuart Philip Ross, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before GOLDBERG and FAY, Circuit Judges, and DUMBAULD *, District Judge:

PER CURIAM:

The district court awarded $105,000 damages to plaintiff on the territorial restrictions claim. That part of the judgment is vacated and the case remanded in light of Continental T. V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., --- U.S. ----, 97 S.Ct. 2549, 53 L.Ed.2d 568 (1977).

On the misrepresentation claim the district court rendered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the jury's $20,000 plaintiff's verdict. We uphold the district court's decision. The most significant alleged misrepresentations cannot support a cause of action because the time at which they should reasonably have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence fell outside the limitations period. Any other misrepresentations could not have induced justifiable reliance.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED and REMANDED IN PART.

* Senior District Judge of the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Dougherty v. Continental Oil Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 11 Septiembre 1978
    ...Schwinn per se rule, we would remand for proceedings consistent with Continental T.V. 1 See Florida Harvestore, Inc. v. A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., 561 F.2d 631 (C.A.5, 1977); Eastern Scientific Co. v. Wild Heerbrugg Instruments, Inc., 572 F.2d 883 (C.A.1, 1978); Adolph Coors Co.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT