Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Moxley
| Decision Date | 01 March 1990 |
| Docket Number | 74480,Nos. 74431,s. 74431 |
| Citation | 557 So.2d 863 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly S97 FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUND, Petitioner, v. Darryl MOXLEY, etc., et al., Respondents. Neil J. KARLIN, M.D., et al., Petitioners, v. Darryl MOXLEY, etc., et al., Respondents. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Melanie G. May of Bunnell and Woulfe, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Alan D. Sackrin of Klein & Tannen, P.A., North Miami Beach, for petitioners.
Gary M. Farmer of Bary M. Farmer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.
We review Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Moxley, 545 So.2d 922, 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified the following question Does the holding in Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985) preclude an attorney's fee in a medical malpractice action above the percentage amount set out in the contingency fee agreement between claimant and her counsel, where the agreement provides that the fee upon recovery shall be the higher of the percentage amount or an amount awarded by the court?
In addition, upon the request of petitioners Karlin, we also review the decision because of its conflict with Spiegel v. Williams, 545 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1989). We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(3) and (4) of the Florida Constitution.
Pursuant to a jury verdict, respondents Moxley obtained a $155,674 judgment for medical malpractice committed by Dr. Karlin. The court also entered a judgment for $150,000 attorney's fees pursuant to section 768.56, Florida Statutes (1981), directing that the Florida Patient's Compensation Fund rather than Karlin would be responsible to pay the attorney's fees. The issues on appeal concerned the amount of attorney's fees and who should pay them.
The Moxleys had entered a fee agreement which provided that their attorney would be paid a percentage of the recovery or the amount of reasonable fees determined by the court, whichever was the greater. Rejecting the argument that Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985), precluded a recovery greater than the amount of the percentages agreed upon between the Moxleys and their attorney, the district court of appeal held that under the alternative provisions of the fee agreement, the Moxleys were entitled to the higher fee awarded by the court as being reasonable. This Court reached a similar conclusion in our recent opinion in Kaufman v. MacDonald, 557 So.2d 572 (Fla.1990). Therefore, we answer the certified question in the negative.
Turning to the other point, this Court in Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So.2d 52 (Fla.1987), held under similar circumstances that the Fund was obligated to pay the plaintiff's attorney's fees unless such fees were payable under the provisions of the health care provider's liability insurance coverage. Dr. Karlin's insurance policy provided $100,000 in liability coverage plus supplementary payments described as...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
First Baptist Church of Cape Coral, Fla., Inc. v. Compass Constr., Inc.
...the court-awarded fee did not exceed the fee agreement reached by [plaintiff] and her attorney.Id.; see also Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Moxley, 557 So.2d 863, 864 (Fla.1990) (holding that plaintiffs, who entered a contingency fee agreement containing an alternative fee recovery clause sim......
-
Orlando Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Chmielewski, s. 89-691
...572 (Fla.1990); Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Moxley, 545 So.2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), affirmed in part, quashed in part, 557 So.2d 863 (Fla.1990); Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Poole, 547 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), rev. denied, 558 So.2d 19 (Fla.1990......
-
Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Lugassy
...agreement which permitted the court to award a reasonable fee in excess of the contingency fee, see e.g., Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Moxley, 557 So.2d 863 (Fla.1990); Kaufman v. MacDonald, 557 So.2d 572 (Fla.1990), the parties' original agreement did not authorize a higher fee. ......
-
Gardner v. Edelstein
...of the fee need not be limited on remand by the fee agreement between Gardner and her attorney. See also Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Moxley, 557 So.2d 863 (Fla.1990); Inacio v. State Farm, 550 So.2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). We acknowledge conflict with Winterbotham v. Winterbotham......
-
In Coverage Case, Florida Court Expansively Construes Costs To Include Attorney's Fees
...for arbitration, ..., which fee must be taxed as part of the prevailing party's costs." In Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Moxley, 557 So. 2d 863, 864 (Fla. 1990), the Florida Supreme Court applied Spiegel when the liability policy covered "all costs taxed against the named insured i......