Florida Women's Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Smith, 82-5445

Decision Date09 June 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-5445,82-5445
PartiesFLORIDA WOMEN'S MEDICAL CLINIC, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jim SMITH, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

Frances M. Farina, North Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.

James A. Peters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 536 F.Supp. 1048.

Before RONEY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

A few days before the oral argument in this case the appellees filed their motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction by reason of F.R.A.P. Rule 4(a)(4). Since the time of filing a notice of appeal affects the jurisdiction of this Court, Williams v. Bolger, 633 F.2d 410 (5th Cir.1980), we are required to notice such a defect if it exists.

The chronology affecting this ground of appeal follows. The trial court entered the order appealed from on March 12, 1982. On March 25, 1982, appellants filed their motion to alter or amend judgment and memorandum in support thereof. On April 12, 1982, appellants filed their notice of appeal of the March 12 order. On July 15, 1982, the trial court ruled on the motion to alter or amend judgment by granting two requests contained in the motion and denying it in other respects. Appellants filed no subsequent notice of appeal.

The basis of appellees' motion is Rule 4(a)(4) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. This Rule provides in part:

A notice of appeal filed before the disposition of any of the above motions [including a Rule 59 motion to alter or amend judgment] shall have no effect. A new notice of appeal must be filed within the prescribed time measured from the entry of the order disposing of the motion as provided above.

The Supreme Court has ruled on this precise question in Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 400, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982). The Court there stated:

Under the plain language of the current rule, a premature notice of appeal "shall have no effect;" a new notice of appeal "must be filed." In short, it is as if no notice of appeal were filed at all and if no notice of appeal was filed at all, the Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to act.

See also U.S. v. Valdosta-Lowndes County Hospital Authority, 668 F.2d 1177 (11th Cir.1982) where this Court stated:

Briefly stated, F.R.A.P. 4(a)(4) nullifies the effect of any notice of appeal filed before the disposition of specified post-trial motions and requires that a new notice of appeal be filed after disposition of these motions.

668 F.2d at 1178.

This Court has most recently held that the filing of a Rule 59 motion brings ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • U.S. v. Cooper, s. 88-2021
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • July 7, 1989
    ...901, 903 (3d Cir.1965), the Third Circuit accepted an appellate brief in lieu of a notice of appeal. In Florida Women's Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Smith, 706 F.2d 1172, 1173 (11th Cir.1983), on the other hand, the Eleventh Circuit refused to accept an appellate brief as a notice of appeal, giv......
  • Smith v. Galley
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • December 26, 1990
    ...the filing of a notice of appeal." United States v. Cooper, 876 F.2d 1192, 1196 (5th Cir.1989) (quoting Florida Women's Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Smith, 706 F.2d 1172, 1173 (11th Cir.1983)). Contra Frace v. Russell, 341 F.2d 901 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 863, 86 S.Ct. 127, 15 L.Ed.2d ......
  • Van Wyk El Paso Inv., Inc. v. Dollar Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • November 14, 1983
    ...has recently rejected an appellate brief as a substitute for notice of appeal in a civil case. See Florida Women's Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Smith, 706 F.2d 1172, 1173 (11th Cir.1983). A liberal construction of the requirements of Rule 3(a) cannot be allowed to nullify the plain provision of ......
  • Luna v. Ford Motor Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • March 10, 1986
    ...a notice of appeal. Cf. G. Van Wyk El Paso Investment v. Dollar Rent-A-Car Systems, 719 F.2d 806 (5th Cir. 1983); Florida Women's Medical Clinic, Inc., v. Smith, 706 F.2d 1172 (11th Cir. (1983). Even if the statement in the August 21, 1984, brief was treated as a notice of appeal; it was pr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT