Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.

Decision Date06 April 2006
Docket NumberNo. 77239-8.
CitationFlower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc., 133 P.3d 474, 156 Wn.2d 1030 (Wash. 2006)
PartiesFLOWER v. T.R.A. INDUSTRIES, INC.
CourtWashington Supreme Court

Appeal from 22765-1-III 127 Wash.App. 13, 111 P.3d 1192.

Disposition of petition for review Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • PBTM LLC v. Football Nw., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • 5 Gennaio 2021
    ... ... Fox Family Worldwide, Inc. , 328 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing White v. Lee , 227 F.3d ... App. at 563, 145 P.3d 386 (citing Flower v. T.R.A. Indus., Inc., 127 Wash. App. 13, 29, 111 P.3d 1192 (2005), ... ...
  • Beroth v. Apollo College, Inc.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 19 Ottobre 2006
    ... ... Flower v. T.R.A. Indus., Inc., 127 Wash.App. 13, 29, 111 P.3d 1192 (2005), review denied, 156 Wash.2d ... ...
  • Wise v. City of Chelan
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 30 Maggio 2006
    ... ... Flower v. T.R.A. Indus., Inc., 127 Wash.App. 13, 27, 111 P.3d 1192 (2005) (citing ... ...
  • Lee v. Curtis, No. 58738-2-I (Wash. App. 10/1/2007)
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 1 Ottobre 2007
    ... ... Lee, husband and wife; and Great Wall Development & Management, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Appellants, ... Daniel Curtis Shane and Jane ... One party may not unilaterally modify ... a contract. Flower v. T.R.A. Indus., Inc., 127 Wn. App. 13, 27-28, 111 P.3d 1192 (2005) ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • §26.6 Analysis
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 26 Rule 26.General Provisions Governing Discovery
    • Invalid date
    ...83 Wn.2d 429, 434, 518 P.2d 1078 (1974); see also Flower v. T.R.A. Indus., Inc., 127 Wn.App. 13, 38, 111 P.3d 1192 (2005), review denied, 156 Wn.2d 1030 2006) (Washington recognizes a "broad right of discovery which is subject to the relatively narrow restrictions of CR There are limits, ho......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...35 Wn.2d 891, 215 P.2d 885 (1950): 59.5(2)(e) Flower v. T.R.A. Indus., Inc., 127 Wn.App. 13, 111 P.3d 1192 (2005), review denied, 156 Wn.2d 1030 (2006): 26.6(2)(a), 26.7(1)(a), 30.6(2), 30.7(1) Fluke Capital & Mgmt. Servs. Co. v. Richmond, 106 Wn.2d 614, 724 P.2d 356 (1986): 15.5(4), 15.7(7......
  • §26.7 Significant Authorities
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 26 Rule 26.General Provisions Governing Discovery
    • Invalid date
    ...to the relatively narrow restrictions of CR 26(c). Flower v. T.R.A. Indus., Inc., 127 Wn.App. 13, 38, 111P.2d1192 (2005), review denied, 156 Wn.2d 1030 (2006). The trial court has broad discretion under CR 26 to manage the discovery process and can limit the scope of discovery through issua......