Floyd v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr., Case No. 3:09-cv-1017-J-34TEM
| Court | U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida |
| Writing for the Court | MARCIA MORALES HOWARD |
| Decision Date | 27 March 2013 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 3:09-cv-1017-J-34TEM |
| Citation | Floyd v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr., Case No. 3:09-cv-1017-J-34TEM (M.D. Fla. Mar 27, 2013) |
| Parties | MAURICE LAMAR FLOYD, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents. |
Petitioner Maurice Lamar Floyd, who is represented by counsel, initiated this action by filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Petition) (Doc. #1) with exhibits (P. Ex.) under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on October 13, 2009. Floyd challenges a 1999 state court (Putnam County, Florida) judgment of conviction for first degree murder. Respondents have submitted a memorandum in opposition to the Petition. See Respondents' Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Response) (Doc. #19) with exhibits (Resp. Ex.). Floyd submitted a brief in reply on December 20, 2010. See Floyd'sPreliminary Statement, Standard of Review and Applicable Law (Reply) (Doc. #21). This case is ripe for review.
On August 5, 1998, the State of Florida charged Maurice Lamar Floyd with first degree murder (count one), armed burglary of a dwelling (count two) and aggravated assault (count three). Resp. Ex. A-1 at 11-12, Indictment. After jury selection on April 5, 1999, Floyd proceeded to a trial. Resp. Exs. A-8; A-9; A-10, Transcripts of the Jury Trial (Tr.). At the conclusion of the trial, a jury found Floyd guilty of first degree murder, armed burglary of a dwelling, and aggravated assault, as charged in the Indictment. Resp. Ex. A-3 at 497-98, Verdict; Tr. at 1998. The jury, by a vote of eleven to one, recommended that the court impose the death penalty. Resp. Exs. A-3 at 504, Penalty Advisory Recommendation; A-11 at 2179. Following a Spencer1 hearing, see Resp. Ex. A-12, on May 26, 1999, the court sentenced Floyd to death for the first degree murder, a term of imprisonment of thirty years for the armed burglary of a dwelling, and a term of imprisonment of five years for the aggravated assault, to run concurrently with count two, see Resp. Ex. A-5 at 976-83, 984-89. The Florida Supreme Court, on direct appeal, set forth the facts of the crimes as well as the testimony at trial.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting