Fluhrer v. Bramel

Decision Date16 November 1937
CitationFluhrer v. Bramel, 158 Or. 694, 73 P.2d 265 (Or. 1937)
PartiesFLUHRER v. BRAMEL, et al.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

In Banc.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; Hall S. Lusk, Judge.

On rehearing.

Former opinion reversed.

For former opinion, see 72 P.2d 47.

BEAN, Chief Justice.

On motion of respondent Fluhrer, an order was issued dismissing the appeal in the above entitled cause taken by the defendant Bramel, in so far as said defendant appeals from the decree in favor of plaintiff, for the reason that said defendant has, since the entry of said decree in the lower court acquiesced therein.

The decree appealed from rescinded the contract between plaintiff and defendant Bramel for the sale of a certain service station situated at 8140 S.W. Macadam avenue, Portland, Or on land which defendant W.E. Bramel held on a lease. The cause was dismissed mainly for the reason that W.E. Bramel had, as it appeared at that time, acquiesced in the decree by leasing the service station to Wolfer's Automotive Service, Inc., after the rendition of the decree appealed from. See (Ore.) 72 P.2d 47.

Upon a petition for rehearing it is shown that the lease from W.E Bramel to Wolfer's Automotive Service, Inc. was made before the decree of the lower court was rendered in the above entitled case. For this reason the order dismissing the appeal taken by Bramel, in so far as said defendant appeals from the decree in favor of plaintiff,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Kelly v. Tracy
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 19, 1956
    ...80 Or. 238, 156 P. 260; Duniway v. Cellars-Murton Co., 92 Or. 113, 170 P. 298, 179 P. 561; Fluhrer v. Bramel, 158 Or. 694, 72 P.2d 47, 73 P.2d 265, 77 P.2d 824; Lewis v. Shook, 182 Or. 483, 188 P.2d 148; 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 212, p. 396. In this case, however, the defendant deposit......
  • Morrison v. Kandler
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1958
    ...such property extended far beyond its mere protection.' To the same effect is the case of Fluhrer v. Bramel, 158 Or. 694, 72 P.2d 47, 73 P.2d 265, 77 P.2d 824. In this case a suit was commenced to rescind a contract involving the purchase and sale of a service station. The trial court grant......
  • Miller v. Barker
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 31, 1962
    ...case from the early strict rule of Kellogg and Lange is recognized in the later cases of Fluhrer v. Bramel, 158 Or. 694, 72 P.2d 47, 73 P.2d 265, 77 P.2d 824 (1938); and Lewis v. Shook, 182 Or. 483, 188 P.2d 148 Fluhrer was an action for rescission of a contract for the sale of a service st......
  • Stevers v. Walker
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • January 30, 1939
  • Get Started for Free