Foflygen v. Zemel

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Citation629 A.2d 1380,535 Pa. 619
Decision Date29 June 1993
PartiesFoflygen (Janice A.) v. Zemel (R., M.D., P.C.), Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Anestesiology Associates, Inc., Betancourt (Sergio, M.D.), Clough (Douglas, M.D.), McGrogan (Martin, M.D.), Weniger (Frederick, M.D.), Lockerman (Lisa, R.N.) NO. 0584W.D.1992

Page 1380

629 A.2d 1380
535 Pa. 619
Foflygen (Janice A.)
v.
Zemel (R., M.D., P.C.), Allegheny General Hospital,
Allegheny Anestesiology Associates, Inc., Betancourt
(Sergio, M.D.), Clough (Douglas, M.D.), McGrogan (Martin,
M.D.), Weniger (Frederick, M.D.), Lockerman (Lisa, R.N.)
NO. 0584W.D.1992
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
June 29, 1993

420 Pa.Super. 18,

615 A.2d 1345

Appeal from the Superior Court.

Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 practice notes
  • Com. v. Hayward
    • United States
    • Superior Court of Pennsylvania
    • June 27, 2000
    ...the precedent as set forth by our Supreme Court. See Foflygen v. Zemel, 420 Pa.Super. 18, 615 A.2d 1345, 1353 (1992), appeal denied, 535 Pa. 619, 629 A.2d 1380 (1993) ("As an intermediate appellate court, this Court is obligated to follow the precedent set down by our Supreme Court."); See ......
  • Beyers v. Richmond, 38 EAP 2006.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • December 28, 2007
    ...by another category of professionals: physicians. Foflygen v. R. Zemel, M.D., 420 Pa.Super. 18, 615 A.2d 1345 (1992), appeal denied, 535 Pa. 619, 629 A.2d 1380 (1993); Gatten v. Merzi, 397 Pa.Super. 148, 579 A.2d 974 (1990), appeal denied, 528 Pa. 611, 596 A.2d 157 (1991). In Gatten, the co......
  • Weinar v. Lex, 1467 EDA 2016
    • United States
    • Superior Court of Pennsylvania
    • December 15, 2017
    ...Zemel, M.D. (PC) , 420 Pa.Super. 18, 615 A.2d 1345, 1350 (1992) (precluding duplicative recovery on alternate theories), appeal denied , 535 Pa. 619, 629 A.2d 1380 (1993). But if, as Weinar contends, his cause of action is for events that occurred after the arbitration, the misconduct (and,......
  • Moses v. TNT Red Star Exp.
    • United States
    • Superior Court of Pennsylvania
    • February 17, 1999
    ...to follow the precedent set down by our Supreme Court. Foflygen v. Zemel, 420 Pa.Super. 18, 615 A.2d 1345, 1353 (1992), appeal denied 535 Pa. 619, 629 A.2d 1380 (1993). It is not the prerogative of an intermediate appellate court to enunciate new precepts of law or to expand existing legal ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
  • Com. v. Hayward
    • United States
    • Superior Court of Pennsylvania
    • June 27, 2000
    ...the precedent as set forth by our Supreme Court. See Foflygen v. Zemel, 420 Pa.Super. 18, 615 A.2d 1345, 1353 (1992), appeal denied, 535 Pa. 619, 629 A.2d 1380 (1993) ("As an intermediate appellate court, this Court is obligated to follow the precedent set down by our Supreme Court."); See ......
  • Beyers v. Richmond, 38 EAP 2006.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • December 28, 2007
    ...by another category of professionals: physicians. Foflygen v. R. Zemel, M.D., 420 Pa.Super. 18, 615 A.2d 1345 (1992), appeal denied, 535 Pa. 619, 629 A.2d 1380 (1993); Gatten v. Merzi, 397 Pa.Super. 148, 579 A.2d 974 (1990), appeal denied, 528 Pa. 611, 596 A.2d 157 (1991). In Gatten, the co......
  • Weinar v. Lex, 1467 EDA 2016
    • United States
    • Superior Court of Pennsylvania
    • December 15, 2017
    ...Zemel, M.D. (PC) , 420 Pa.Super. 18, 615 A.2d 1345, 1350 (1992) (precluding duplicative recovery on alternate theories), appeal denied , 535 Pa. 619, 629 A.2d 1380 (1993). But if, as Weinar contends, his cause of action is for events that occurred after the arbitration, the misconduct (and,......
  • Moses v. TNT Red Star Exp.
    • United States
    • Superior Court of Pennsylvania
    • February 17, 1999
    ...to follow the precedent set down by our Supreme Court. Foflygen v. Zemel, 420 Pa.Super. 18, 615 A.2d 1345, 1353 (1992), appeal denied 535 Pa. 619, 629 A.2d 1380 (1993). It is not the prerogative of an intermediate appellate court to enunciate new precepts of law or to expand existing legal ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT