Fogle v. General Credit, 7468.

Decision Date29 January 1940
Docket NumberNo. 7468.,7468.
Citation71 App. DC 338,110 F.2d 128
PartiesFOGLE et al. v. GENERAL CREDIT, Inc.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

P. Michael Cook, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.

William R. Lichtenberg and Joseph B. Danzansky, both of Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, VINSON, and RUTLEDGE, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit in equity in which the appellant, the plaintiff below, sought a decree declaring void a lien asserted by the appellee, the defendant below, upon a certain automobile, and sought also to compel the appellee to deliver a certificate of title to the car. There was a counterclaim by the appellee which sought delivery of the car to it or in lieu thereof damages in the sum of $350. The decree was for the appellee.

In its decree, the trial court said:

"This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court upon the pleadings, and admitted evidence as submitted to the Court by counsel in open Court, and the Court having jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties, and upon consideration of the admitted facts, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant, General Credit, Inc., is the holder of a recorded chattel mortgage on a certain 1938 Plymouth Sedan Automobile, Serial Number 10542389, Motor Number P6-128183, in the amount of $350.00, and that the automobile is in the possession of the plaintiffs, and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant is entitled to the automobile by virtue of its recorded chattel mortgage or in lieu thereof the satisfaction of its lien in the amount of $350.00, it is, by the Court, this 23rd day of May, 1939, adjudged * * *." Italics supplied

There is nothing in the record indicating what the admitted evidence was, or what the court found as admitted facts. If the foregoing recital was intended to be a finding of facts, it was but partial. Numerous other items of fact were in issue under the pleadings.

Rule 52 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of the United States, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, requires that: "In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon and direct the entry of the appropriate judgment; * * *."

In the absence of the evidence upon which the case was decided and of findings of fact, the case is not in a condition to be reviewed. See Boss v. Hardee, 1937, 68 App.D.C. 75...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 12 Septiembre 1951
    ...1945, 149 F. 2d 612, certiorari denied, sub. nom. Fischer v. Bowers, 326 U.S. 753, 66 S. Ct. 91, 90 L.Ed. 451; Fogle v. General Credit, Inc., 1940, 71 App.D.C. 338, 110 F.2d 128; Hopkins v. Wallin, 3 Cir., 1949, 179 F.2d 136; Girard Trust Co. v. United States, 3 Cir., 1945, 149 F.2d 872; Ci......
  • Schilling v. Schwitzer-Cummins Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 31 Marzo 1944
    ...76 U.S.App.D.C. 341, 131 F.2d 349; National Savings & Trust Co. v. Shutack, ___ U.S.App.D.C. ___, 139 F.2d 371; Fogle v. General Credit, Inc., 71 App.D.C. 338, 110 F.2d 128; Boss v. Hardee, 68 App.D.C. 75, 93 F.2d 234. See Matton Oil Transfer Corp. v. The Dynamic, 2 Cir., 123 F. 2d 999; Gra......
  • Fogle v. General Credit
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 30 Junio 1941
    ...Reversed and remanded. 1 Upon a former appeal the case was remanded for want of sufficient findings. Fogle & City Bank v. General Credit, Inc., 1940, 71 App.D.C. 338, 110 F.2d 128. 2 During the pendency of the suit, the certificate was delivered to plaintiffs pursuant to an order of court w......
  • Knapp v. Imperial Oil & Gas Products Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 27 Agosto 1942
    ...60 S.Ct. 517, 84 L.Ed. 774; Interstate Circuit, Inc., v. United States, 304 U.S. 55, 58 S.Ct. 768, 82 L.Ed. 1146; Fogle v. General Credit, 71 App.D.C. 338, 110 F.2d 128; Humphrey v. Helgerson, 8 Cir., 78 F.2d 484; Siano v. Helvering, 3 Cir., 79 F.2d 444; Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT