Foltz v. Commonwealth Of Va.
| Decision Date | 23 September 2010 |
| Docket Number | Record No. 0521-09-4. |
| Citation | 699 S.E.2d 522,57 Va.App. 163 |
| Parties | David L. FOLTZ, Jr., s/k/a David Lee Foltz, Jr., Appellant,v.COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee. |
| Court | Virginia Court of Appeals |
From the Circuit Court of Arlington County.
Walter S. FELTON, JR., C.J., Larry G. ELDER, Robert P. FRANK, Robert J. HUMPHREYS, D. Arthur KELSEY, Elizabeth A. McCLANAHAN, James W. HALEY, JR., William G. PETTY, Randolph A. BEALES, Cleo E. POWELL, Rossie D. ALSTON, JR., JJ.
Pursuant to Code § 17.1-402(D)(ii), the Court, on its own motion, has decided to hear this case en banc. The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35(b). It is further ordered that the appellant shall file twelve additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
In accordance therewith, the mandate entered herein on September 7, 2010 is stayed pending the decision of the Court en banc and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Cuevas–perez
...technology provides an insufficient basis for distinguishing Knotts.”) (internal citation omitted), reh'g en banc granted, 57 Va.App. 163, 699 S.E.2d 522 (2010). 1. Courts look to doctrine rather than the ordinary meaning of the term “search” to figure out if law enforcement have conducted ......
-
Foltz v. Commonwealth of Va..
...Pursuant to Code § 17.1–402(D)(ii), we ordered rehearing en banc and stayed the mandate of the panel decision. See Foltz v. Commonwealth, 57 Va.App. 163, 699 S.E.2d 522 (2010). On rehearing en banc, we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to suppress the e......