Fontana, Application of

Decision Date30 December 1976
PartiesApplication of Patrick FONTANA.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Eric A. Summerville, Newark, for appellant Fontana.

Arnold Cohen, Deputy Atty. Gen., Division of Criminal Justice, for respondent State of N.J. (William F. Hyland, Atty. Gen. attorney; William Welaj, Deputy Atty. Gen., of counsel).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, MORGAN and E. GAULKIN.

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Fontana (hereafter defendant) appeals from the denial of his application for expungement of his record of convictions pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:164--28.

In 1962 defendant was charged in six separate indictments with five counts of breaking and entering with intent to steal, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2A:94--1, and five counts of larceny, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2A:119--2.

The charges were based on a series of events which started on February 27, 1962, when defendant and two others (one a juvenile) broke and entered a delicatessen and stole 20 cases of beer and one case of soda. About one week later they started to consume the beer and, on the night of March 7 and during the darly morning hours of March 8, they entered a television service and supply store, a motor vehicle, a market and a private dwelling, and stole a hi-fi stereo, motor vehicle fender skirts, cigars, cigarettes and some money.

Defendant pleaded guilty to all counts of the six indictments and was sentenced to concurrent suspended sentences, placed on probation for two years and fined $500. Thirteen years later defendant applied for expungement of his record of convictions pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:164--28, which provided in pertinent part at the time the application was made 1:

In all cases wherein a criminal conviction has been entered against any person whereon sentence was suspended, or a fine imposed of not more than $1000 and no subsequent conviction has been entered against such person, it shall be lawful after the lapse of ten years from the date of such conviction for the person so convicted to present a duly verified petition to the Court, wherein such conviction was entered, setting forth all the facts in the matter and praying for the relief provided in this section.

In ruling on the application for expungement the trial judge stated that he 'would like to help this man because he was in court * * * and he impressed me.' However, he said he felt that he had no discretion since the statute spoke in terms of 'a conviction' and he was convinced defendant had six convictions and, accordingly, was not eligible for the benefit of the statute.

The only issue presented by this appeal is whether defendant's conviction of the crimes charged in the six indictments can be considered 'a conviction' so as to qualify him for expungement under N.J.S.A. 2A:164--28.

We hold that under the circumstances of this case the statute is applicable...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • State v. J. C. S.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • February 3, 1978
    ...will be advanced by a construction which authorizes expungement under the circumstances here present." In re Fontana, 146 N.J.Super. 264, 267, 369 A.2d 935, 936 (App.Div.1976) (dealing with a different expungement statute, N.J.S.A. When N.J.S.A. 24:21-28 was enacted in 1970 "split" sentence......
  • In re C.P.M., DOCKET NO. A-4210-18T3
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • December 6, 2019
    ...periodically granted under a "single spree" or "crime spree" doctrine. This doctrine, first enunciated in In re Fontana, 146 N.J. Super. 264, 267, 369 A.2d 935 (App. Div. 1976), was later rejected in In re Ross, 400 N.J. Super. 117, 122, 946 A.2d 86 (App. Div. 2008).In 2015, the Supreme Cou......
  • State v. A.R.
    • United States
    • New Jersey District Court
    • November 12, 2019
    ...under N.J.S.A. 2C:52-2(a). Rather, in 1976, the Appellate Division carved out a "crime spree" exception in In re Fontana, 146 N.J. Super. 264, 369 A.2d 935 (App. Div. 1976). In that case, the defendant pled guilty to ten offenses which spanned nine days. Id. at 266, 369 A.2d 935. The Appell......
  • State v. A.N.J.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • February 11, 1985
    ...need not cast doubt upon the view that a "one-night spree" could still constitute a one-time offense. See In re Patrick Fontana, 146 N.J.Super. 264, 267, 369 A.2d 935 (App.Div.1976). ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT