Forcier v. Hopkins
Decision Date | 08 January 1953 |
Citation | 110 N.E.2d 126,329 Mass. 668 |
Parties | FORCIER v. HOPKINS. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Thomas M. Dolling, Fitchburg, Max L. Rubin, Boston, for the plaintiff.
Stanley B. Milton, Worcester, Robert C. Milton, Worcester, for the defendant.
Before QUA, C. J., and RONAN, WILKINS, SPALDING and WILLIAMS, JJ.
This is an action of tort for personal injury and property damage resulting from a collision of automobiles operated respectively by the plaintiff and the defendant. There was a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff's exceptions, which are before us, relate principally to a matter of evidence. In cross-examination of the plaintiff, who had testified in his own behalf, counsel for the defendant offered the records of two convictions of the plaintiff of misdemeanors committed in 1951. The first record was that of a complaint for assault on which the plaintiff was found guilty in the District Court and given a sentence in the house of correction for six months, which sentence was suspended for two years and the plaintiff placed on probation. The second record was that of a complaint for being a lewd person on which the plaintiff was found guilty in the District Court and sentenced to four months in the house of correction, which sentence was suspended for a year and the plaintiff placed on probation. Both records were admitted in evidence subject to the exceptions of the plaintiff and the jury were instructed that they were in evidence 'solely to affect the credibility of the plaintiff as a witness.' The plaintiff also excepted to a ruling of the judge permitting the records to be taken into the jury room.
Under G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 233, § 21, it is provided that 'The conviction of a witness of a crime may be shown to affect his credibility'. Prior to the amendment of this section by St. 1950, c. 426, the statute made the admissibility of records of conviction subject to the following exceptions: Paragraph 'Second' was stricken out by the 1950 statute and the following paragraph inserted in its place:
The plaintiff contends, first, that by specifically providing in the substituted paragraph for the admission in evidence of the record of conviction of a felony where the sentence was suspended, the Legislature impliedly intended to make inadmissible the record of conviction of a misdmeanor where similarly the sentence was suspended; and, second, that a sentence which has been suspended is not a final judgment and, therefore, the record of it is not admissible. Since the enactment of St. 1852, c. 312, § 60, on which G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 233, § 21, is based, this court has held consistently that the term 'conviction' as used in the statute means a judgment that conclusively establishes guilt after a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Edgerly
...U.S. 380, 387, 18 S.Ct. 922, 924, 43 L.Ed. 204 (1898). And the Legislature is presumed to be aware of that rule. Forcier v. Hopkins, 329 Mass. 668, 671, 110 N.E.2d 126 (1953). Further, the statute applies to "any proceeding" and it is thus at such a point that the statute is made applicable......
-
Com. v. Carr
...ruled on; and the finding of guilty may suffice in this context as a conviction though sentence has not passed. Cf. Forcier v. Hopkins, 329 Mass. 668, 110 N.E.2d 126 (1953); Commonwealth v. Lockwood, 109 Mass. 323 (1872). The case is remanded to the Superior Court for proceedings consistent......
-
Ciampi v. Commissioner of Correction
...other things omitted from statute not followed where it would frustrate general beneficial purpose of statute); Forcier v. Hopkins, 329 Mass. 668, 671, 110 N.E.2d 126 (1953) (same). Here, the general purpose of G.L. c. 124, § 1 (b), (i), and (q), and G.L. c. 127, § 33, is to maintain safety......
-
Com. v. Preston
...defined the time that a criminal "conviction" occurs differently for different purposes. For example, compare Forcier v. Hopkins, 329 Mass. 668, 670-671, 110 N.E.2d 126 (1953) (sentencing), with Commonwealth v. Carr, 373 Mass. 617, 626, 369 N.E.2d 970 (1977) (jury verdict). In Commonwealth ......