Ford v. Planters' Chemical & Oil Co.
| Decision Date | 16 January 1930 |
| Docket Number | 7 Div. 912. |
| Citation | Ford v. Planters' Chemical & Oil Co., 220 Ala. 669, 126 So. 866 (Ala. 1930) |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
| Parties | FORD v. PLANTERS' CHEMICAL & OIL CO. |
Rehearing Denied April 3, 1930.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Talladega County; R. B. Carr, Judge.
Action for damages by Richard Ford, a minor, suing by his next friend, Ruby Ford, against the Planters' Chemical & Oil Company. From adverse rulings on pleading, sustaining demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff takes a nonsuit and appeals.
Affirmed.
Counts 1 and A of the complaint are as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Birmingham Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Alley
... ... A ... child as well as an adult may be a trespasser. Ford v ... Planters' Chemical & Oil Co., 220 Ala. 669, 672, 126 ... So. 866; Southern R. Co. v ... ...
-
Massey v. Wright
...Corp. v. Tillery, 261 Ala. 34, 72 So.2d 719; Luallen v. Woodstock Iron & Steel Corp., 236 Ala. 621, 184 So. 182; Ford v. Planters' Chem. & Oil Co., 220 Ala. 669, 126 So. 866; Williams v. Bolding, 220 Ala. 328, 124 So. 892; Eades v. American Cast-Iron Pipe Co., 208 Ala. 556, 94 So. 593; Athe......
-
Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Green
...cases is inapplicable where the danger is obvious and patent. Williams v. Bolding, 220 Ala. 328, 124 So. 892; Ford v. Planters' Chemical Co., supra [220 Ala. 669, 126 So. 866].' Counsel for appellee contends that even though water hazards are not to be considered as attractive nuisances, th......
-
Moseley v. Alabama Power Co.
... ... Am.Jur. p. 779), a child may be a trespasser just as well as ... an adult. Ford v. Planters' Chemical & Oil Co., 220 ... Ala. 669, 126 So. 866; Luallen v. Woodstock Iron & Steel ... ...