Ford v. State
| Docket Number | 52272 |
| Decision Date | 29 September 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
32 cases
-
State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State
...vague if it is “ ‘so standardless that it authorizesor encourages seriously discriminatory enforcement.’ ” Ford v. State, 127 Nev. ––––, ––––, 262 P.3d 1123, 1125 (2011) (quoting United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285, 304, 128 S.Ct. 1830, 170 L.Ed.2d 650 (2008)). To survive a vagueness ch......
-
State v. Washington-Davis
...statute against an overbreadth challenge because the statute did not proscribe constitutionally protected conduct); Ford v. State, 127 Nev. 608, 262 P.3d 1123, 1130–31 (2011) (finding a statute that criminalizes the pandering of prostitution was not unconstitutionally overbroad because the ......
-
Boyd v. State
...that testimony on pimp-prostitution culture and argot may constitute admissible expert testimony, see, e.g., Ford v. State , 127 Nev. 608, 625 n.9, 262 P.3d 1123, 1134 n.9 (2011), and here, we conclude that Leung offered relevant testimony that assisted the jury to determine whether Boyd's ......
-
Willson v. First Jud. Dist. Ct.
...applications of the law are substantial when ‘judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep.’ " Ford v. State, 127 Nev. 608, 612, 262 P.3d 1123, 1125 (2011) (quoting Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41, 52, 119 S.Ct. 1849, 144 L.Ed.2d 67 (1999)). The First Amendment of the United......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Sex Work
...to pay compensation for sexual activity. 51 Some states, however, have deliberately refused to criminalize the 46. Compare Ford v. State, 262 P.3d 1123, 1126 (Nev. 2011) (construing prostitution statute as requiring a specific intent to become or remain a prostitute), with State v. Allen, ......
-
Sex Work
...paid to watch defendant fondle a breast, pretextually for the detective’s own sexual gratification). 51. Compare Ford v. State, 262 P.3d 1123, 1126 (Nev. 2011) (construing prostitution statute as requiring a specific intent to become or remain a prostitute), with State v. Allen, 37 Conn. ......
-
Sex work
...paid to watch defendant fondle a breast, pretextually for the detective’s own sexual gratification). 46. Compare Ford v. State, 262 P.3d 1123, 1126 (Nev. 2011) (construing prostitution statute as requiring a specific intent to become or remain a prostitute), with State v. Allen, 37 Conn. Su......
-
Sex work
...paid to watch defendant fondle a breast, pretextually for the detective’s own sexual gratification). 46. Compare Ford v. State, 262 P.3d 1123, 1126 (Nev. 2011) (construing prostitution statute as requiring a specific intent to become or remain a prostitute), with State v. Allen, 37 Conn. Su......