Ford v. Town of Windham
| Docket Number | 2011-262 |
| Decision Date | 24 February 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
16 cases
-
Ridlon v. N.H. Bureau of Sec. Regulation
...as to the importance of the jury trial right, we are bound by the law as set forth in our past cases. See Ford v. N.H. Dep't of Transp., 163 N.H. 284, 290, 37 A.3d 436 (2012) (discussing the doctrine of stare decisis). Yet, if we were to adopt the dissent's rationale, we would be hard press......
-
Seacoast Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Portsmouth
...or come to be seen so differently, as to have robbed the old rule of significant application or justification. Ford v. N.H. Dep't of Transp., 163 N.H. 284, 290, 37 A.3d 436 (2012). Although these factors guide our judgment, no single factor is dispositive. Id.First, we recognize that a broa......
-
Farrelly v. City of Concord
...fourth argument is meritorious. Discretionary-function immunity, which protects both the state, see Ford v. N.H. Dep't of Transp., 163 N.H. 284, 294, 37 A.3d 436 (2012), and municipalities, see Tarbell Adm'r, Inc. v. City of Concord, 157 N.H. 678, 683, 956 A.2d 322 (2008), “seeks to ‘limit ......
-
Union Leader Corp. v. Town of Salem
..."because the doctrine of stare decisis is not one to be either rigidly applied or blindly followed." Ford v. N.H. Dep't of Transp., 163 N.H. 284, 290, 37 A.3d 436 (2012). The first stare decisis factor "examines whether a rule has become difficult or impractical for trial courts to apply." ......
Get Started for Free
