Forest Nursery Company v. Crete Carrier Corporation

Decision Date26 August 1970
Docket NumberCiv. A. No. 991.
PartiesFOREST NURSERY COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, v. CRETE CARRIER CORPORATION, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, and Jerry E. Ramsey, Defendant, v. Mike KOSISEK d/b/a Friend Truck Line, Third-Party Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee

Ben P. Lynch, Winchester, Tenn., Charles D. Haston, McMinnville, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Joe R. Hickerson, Winchester, Tenn., John M. McCord, Henry, McCord, Forrester & Richardson, Tullahoma, Tenn., Donald H. Bowman, Lincoln, Neb., for defendant and third-party plaintiff.

John M. McCord, Tullahoma, Tenn., for third-party defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This is a diversity, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1), (c), civil action for after-salvage damages to a shipment from Tennessee to South Dakota of nursery stock. The plaintiff claims that, disobedient to its specific instructions to maintain a certain temperature in the trailer bearing this cargo, which was specially equipped for this purpose, the defendant Mr. Ramsey negligently allowed the cargo to freeze solidly in Omaha, Nebraska en route to its destination. The defendant corporation moves for a transfer of this action to the District of Nebraska. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).*

This Court has a broad discretion in acting on this motion, but is limited to a consideration of the three factors specifically mentioned in 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), and may not properly be governed by any other factor or consideration. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co. v. Igoe, C.A.7th (1955), 220 F.2d 299, 302 1. Those factors are: (a) the convenience of the parties, (b) the convenience of the witnesses, and (c) the interest of justice. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). "* * * The idea behind § 1404(a) is that where a `civil action' to vindicate a wrong—however brought in a court—presents issues and requires witnesses that make one District Court more convenient than another, the trial judge can, after findings, transfer the whole action to the more convenient court. * * *" Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585 (1960), 364 U.S. 19, 26, 80 S.Ct. 1470, 1475, 4 L.Ed.2d 1540, 1545 6. "But unless the balance is strongly in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff's choice of forum should rarely be disturbed. * * *" Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert (1947), 330 U.S. 501, 508, 67 S.Ct. 839, 843, 91 L.Ed. 1055, 1062 3, 4.

The defendant corporation claims that all of its witnesses reside in Nebraska, some of whom are not its employees, and that its records are all in Nebraska. The plaintiff claims all its witnesses reside in Tennessee, some of whom are not its employees. The interest of justice does not seem to require the action to be tried in either forum desired. It appears that it would be as inconvenient for the parties and witnesses in one forum to travel to the other forum, as for the parties and witnesses in the other forum to travel to the first. In like manner, the comparative conveniences of the parties are in equipoise. As the balance does not strongly favor the defendant corporation, the plaintiff's choice of this forum will not be disturbed. Idem.

The motion of the defendant corporation for a transfer of this action to the District of Nebraska, therefore, hereby is

Denied.

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This action was commenced on July 1, 1969. Substituted service of process was had on the defendant Mr. Ramsey sometime between January 28 and February 3, 1970. The summons required Mr. Ramsey to answer within 20 days after such service. No answer by Mr. Ramsey has been filed. Approximately six months have elapsed since Mr. Ramsey was required to plead or otherwise defend herein as provided by the pertinent Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Despite this long lapse of time, the plaintiff Forest Nursery Company, Inc. has not prosecuted its claim against Mr. Ramsey, against whom it seeks a judgment for affirmative relief, and who has failed to so plead or otherwise defend. Rule 55(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

"* * * For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute * * *, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action * * * against him. * * *" Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. "* * * The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiff's action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted. The power to invoke this sanction is necessary...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Burdeshaw v. White
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 26 Julio 1991
    ...with [six years of protracted litigation and] counsel's failure to appear at a pre-trial conference); Forest Nursery Co. v. Crete Carrier Corp., 319 F.Supp. 213 (E.D.Tenn.1970) (failure of defendant to answer a summons 6 months after required by statute); Delta Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount P......
  • United States ex rel. Falconer v. Pate
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 13 Noviembre 1970
  • Cabaniss v. Wilson
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 1986
    ...v. Wabash R. Co., supra (inactivity coupled with counsel's failure to appear at a pre-trial conference); Forest Nursery Co. v. Crete Carrier Corp., 319 F.Supp. 213 (E.D.Tenn.1970) (failure of defendant to answer a summons 6 months after required by statute); Delta Theatres, Inc. v. Paramoun......
  • Blake v. Stinson
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • 3 Octubre 2008
    ...[370 U.S. 626 (1962) ] (inactivity coupled with counsel's failure to appear at a pre-trial conference); Forest Nursery Co. v. Crete Carrier Corp., 319 F.Supp. 213 (E.D.Tenn.1970)(failure of defendant to answer a summons 6 months after required by statute); Delta Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT