Forlines v. Paulk
Decision Date | 17 December 1942 |
Docket Number | 4 Div. 249. |
Parties | FORLINES v. PAULK et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
J. C. Fleming, of Elba, for appellant.
Carmichael Crenshaw & Simmons, of Opp, for appellees.
The appeal is from a decree denying relief to the complainant.
A pertinent part of that decree was,
The court further found:
The decree, under the cross-bill, was for a reference to ascertain the balance due on the mortgage debt with legal interest to date of the filing of the register's report. Interest will be computed at the lawful interest provided by our statutes which obtain. Code 1940, T. 9, §§ 60, 61. Acts 1927, p. 440, Acts 1935, p. 69.
The mortgage in question of date of May 6, 1931, contained, among other things, the following recitals:
The due date of the mortgage is not specifically stated other than that it was to be effective for the years 1931 to 1933, inclusive.
The question for decision is whether or not there should be annulment of the mortgage of complainant on the theory the debt sought to be secured was that of the husband and the wife was thereby to become surety for his debts in violation of the Code 1940, T. 34, § 74, Code 1923, § 8272.
Upon consideration of the cause for final decree upon pleading and proof on testimony given ore tenus the trial court denied the relief prayed and ordered a reference on the cross-bill to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Weatherwax v. Heflin
...future advances must be confined to such as are in the contemplation of the parties at the time the agreement is made. [Forelines v. Paulk et al., Ala.Sup., 10 So.2d 864; Bynon v. Citizens' Bank of Carbon Hill, 221 626, 130 So. 391.] "A mortgage does not secure obligations which were not co......
-
Sansom v. Sturkie, 7 Div. 758.
...670, 73 So. 989, the wife as well as the husband applied to the mortgagee for the loan which was "made direct to them." Forlines v. Paulk, 243 Ala. 516, 10 So.2d 864, loan was considered a gift by the wife of future credits for the conduct of a new business and within the rule of Bell v. Fa......
-
Peoples Sav. Bank v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.
... ... all extensions and/or renewals thereof." Such a ... conveyance has been sustained in the recent decision of ... Forlines v. Paulk et al., 243 Ala. 516, 10 So.2d ... In the ... summer of 1942 Thompson still owed the note due December 1, ... 1936, for $2,675 ... ...
-
Martin v. First Nat. Bank of Opelika
...Ala. 344; Bank of Oakman v. Thompson, 231 Ala. 73, 163 So. 614; First National Bank v. Lafon, 231 Ala. 403, 165 So. 233; Forlines v. Paulk, 243 Ala. 516, 10 So.2d 864. The mortgagee bank throughout retained the original note and mortgage executed by appellant and her husband and it is infer......