Fort Lauderdale Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Fallaro
Citation | 616 So.2d 594 |
Decision Date | 07 April 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 92-0876,92-0876 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Parties | 18 Fla. L. Week. D916 FORT LAUDERDALE LINCOLN MERCURY, INC., d/b/a South Florida Leasing & Rentals, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. David FALLARO, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. |
Robert D. Lettman of Robert D. Lettman, P.A., Tamarac, for appellant/cross-appellee.
Ralph P. Ezzo of Law Offices of Ralph P. Ezzo, P.A., Miami, for appellee/cross-appellant.
Fort Lauderdale Lincoln Mercury, Inc. appeals from a final judgment in its favor on a common law breach of contract claim and against it on an odometer disclosure claim predicated on 15 U.S.C. sections 1988 and 1989 (1988). 1 Appellant argues that the trial court employed an improper "intent" standard under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1989. Additionally, appellant argues that the trial court erred when it failed to award lost profits as damages on the breach of contract claim. We agree and reverse.
Section 1989(a) provides that "any person who, with intent to defraud, violates any requirement imposed under this subchapter shall be liable in any amount equal to the sum of: (1) three times the amount of actual damages sustained or $1,500, whichever is greater", and attorneys fees and costs. Pursuant to the trial court's written order, it found that there was an insufficient showing of fact to constitute willful and wanton conduct by appellee to meet section 1989's burden. Willful and wanton conduct is not the correct intent standard. See, e.g., Bill Terry's Inc. v. Atlantic Motor Sales, 409 So.2d 507, 509 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Ryan v. Edwards, 592 F.2d 756 (4th Cir.1979). Nieto v. Pence, 578 F.2d 640 (5th Cir.1978) ( ). As the court applied the wrong standard for intent, this matter must be reversed.
We also address appellant's second point that the trial court erred when denying its request for lost profits as a portion of compensatory damages. The correct measure of damages in a breach of contract action includes the lost profits which would have resulted from the performance of the contract if the lost profits can be ascertained within a reasonable degree of certainty. See, e.g., Ed. L. Nezelek v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 383 So.2d 979 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 302 So.2d 461 (Fla....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tymar Distribution LLC v. Mitchell Grp. USA, LLC
...marks and citation omitted). Lost profits are certainly compensatory damages. See, e.g. , Fort Lauderdale Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Fallaro , 616 So. 2d 594, 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (characterizing lost profits as compensatory damages). And in claims with no underlying transaction, such as b......
-
S & S Toyota, Inc. v. Kirby
...records although the four year old car had suspiciously low mileage. 409 So.2d at 509. See also Fort Lauderdale Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Fallaro, 616 So.2d 594 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (willful and wanton conduct is not the correct standard for the "intent to defraud" under section Here, the jur......
-
Tymar Distribution LLC v. Mitchell Grp. U.S.
...... Inc.'s Joint Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF No. ... (citing. St. Paul Mercury Indem. v. Red Cab Co. , 303 U.S. 283, 298 ... See, e.g. , Fort. Lauderdale Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. ......
-
Performance Cars, Inc. v. Inside Trader, Inc.
...699 So.2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); S & S Toyota, Inc. v. Kirby, 649 So.2d 916 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Fort Lauderdale Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Fallaro, 616 So.2d 594 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Kala Invs., Inc. v. Sklar, 538 So.2d 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (......