Forte v. Forte, 85-1429
Decision Date | 12 November 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 85-1429,85-1429 |
Citation | 478 So.2d 460,10 Fla. L. Weekly 2522 |
Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2522 John FORTE, Appellant, v. Mary FORTE, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Hauser & Metsch and Lydia A. Fernandez, Miami, for appellant.
Fred M. Dellapa, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
To continue reading
Request your trial6 cases
-
McCutcheon v. Tracy
...Farkas v. Farkas, 426 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Zakoor v. Zakoor, 240 So.2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). As such, in Forte v. Forte, 478 So.2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), we held that a portion of a separation agreement and final judgment of dissolution granting the wife the option to purchas......
-
Kuhnke v. Kuhnke
...do not justify modification of a property settlement agreement. This court has ruled in accordance with existing law. In Forte v. Forte, 478 So.2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So.2d 830 (Fla.1986), we held that a portion of a separation agreement and final judgment of dissolut......
-
Power v. Power, 5D03-888.
...See also Campbell v. Campbell, 615 So.2d 879 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Draper v. Draper, 604 So.2d 946 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Forte v. Forte, 478 So.2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So.2d 830 (Fla. 1986). Thus, in the case before us if the option granted by the final judgment (as oppos......
- State v. Carter
Request a trial to view additional results