Foss v. People's Gas Light & Coke Co.
Decision Date | 14 October 1909 |
Citation | 89 N.E. 351,241 Ill. 238 |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
Parties | FOSS v. PEOPLE'S GAS LIGHT & COKE CO. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Appellate Court, First District, on Appeal from Circuit Court, Cook County; J. W. Mack, Judge.
Bill by John P. Foss against the People's Gas Light & Coke Company. From a decree dismissing the bill, affirmed by the Appellate Court, complainant appeals. Affirmed.
Knight, Barbour & Adams, Francis W. Walker, Robert F. Pettibone, and Feed H. Raymond (H. S. & F. S. Osborne and Albert G. Welch, of counsel), for appellant.
Sears, Meagher & Whitney (James F. Meagher and Jesse J. Ricks, of counsel), for appellee.
John P. Foss filed a bill in the circuit court of Cook county against the People's Gas Light & Coke Company, to which a general demurrer was interposed and sustained. Afterwards Foss filed an amended bill, to which a general demurrer was sustained, the complainant's application to further amend his bill denied, and the bill dismissed. The decree dismissing the bill for want of equity having been affirmed by the Appellate Court for the First District, by his further appeal Foss has brought the record to this court for review.
Only two questions are presented for our consideration: First. Did the court err in sustaining the demurrer to the amended bill? Second. If the bill was defective, did the court err in denying the appellant's application for leave to amend?
The amended bill states that the defendant gas company is an Illinois corporation, organized under a special act of the Legislature approved February 12, 1855 (Priv. Laws 1855, p. 614), and amended in 1865 (Priv. Laws 1865, p. 589); that said gas company is engaged in the manufacture and sale of gas for illuminating and other purposes in the city of Chicago; that said company has since 1865 been extensively engaged in the manufacture and sale of gas, from which large revenues and profits have been derived which by right ought to have been distributed to the stockholders; that about the year 1887 the gas company by merger or consolidation acquired the property and franchises of the Illinois Light, Heat & Power Company, and that subsequently, between 1887 and 1899, a number of other gas companies were merged into or consolidated with the appellee company; that appellee, as such consolidated company, has been engaged in the manufacture and sale of gas in the city of Chicago, and elsewhere in Cook county, all the time since the mergers or consolidations occurred, and that from such business the company has derived large profits and incomes, the surplus of which, after the payment of its debts and obligations, is and by right ought to be the property of its stockholders; that the original capital stock of appellee was $500,000; and that since the company was organized under the authority of the amendatory act of February, 1865, the capital stock has been increased from time to time, as the exigencies of its business and the purchase of other properties required, until now the capital stock of appellee is $35,000,000, of which shares to the amount of $32,969,100 have been issued and are now outstanding. The amended bill then avers ‘that in or about 1857 complainant became, ever since has been, and now is a stockholder of the People's Gas Light & Coke Company and the owner of 1,500 shares, of the par value of $50 each, of the original capital stock of said defendant corporation, which were and are full paid and nonassessable, and that complainant, since the year 1857, has been, and now is, entitled to receive his proportionate share of the surplus profits earned by the defendant corporation whenever any distribution of the surplus profits of defendant has been made to the stockholders of said corporation.’
The amended bill then proceeds as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Moore v. Van Tassell Real Estate & Live Stock Company
... ... Walker, 156 Ky. 536, ... 161 S.W. 512, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 363; Foss v. Gas Light & ... Coke Co., 241 Ill. 238, 89 N.E. 351; 38 C. J. 795; ... ...
-
Auten v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company
...81 Ark. 279; 86 Ark. 591; 85 Ark. 372; 18 F. 209; 65 N.H. 394; 16 Blatch. 549; 206 Ill. 261, 68 N.E. 1070; 11 Wall. 96-109; 241 Ill. 238, 89 N.E. 351; 124 N.Y.S. 85. of knowledge are in equity equivalent to knowledge itself. And where the circumstances are sufficient to have induced inquiry......
-
Dibble v. Winter
...authorities of this state, that the allegation in question is a statement of fact, and not a conclusion of law. Foss v. People's Gaslight & Coke Co., 241 Ill. 238, 89 N. E. 351;Bogda v. Glos, 244 Ill. 575, 91 N. E. 657;Pease v. Sanderson, 188 Ill. 597, 59 N. E. 425. Counsel for appellants s......
-
Zegers v. Zegers, Inc.
...claim that he was an owner. The standard of diligence in asserting a claimed right required by the court in Foss v. People's Gas Light & Coke Co. (1909), 241 Ill. 238, 89 N.E. 351, is applicable in this case. The plaintiff there became a stockholder in 1857 and brought suit in 1905, allegin......