Foster v. State, 50393

Decision Date19 June 1980
Docket NumberNo. 50393,50393
Citation387 So.2d 344
PartiesClyde FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the Court on appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit, in and for Columbia County, in which that court imposed a sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla.Const.

The appellant and Betty Jean Strouder were both indicted for the felony-murder and premeditated murder of two persons. Attorney Thomas K. McKee, Jr., was appointed by the court to represent both defendants.

The trial court imposed the sentence of death on the appellant on December 13, 1974. The notice of appeal was not filed with this Court until October 11, 1976. The delay by trial counsel in effecting the appeal was apparently due to a fee dispute. On August 11, 1978, we granted appellant's counsel leave to withdraw and appointed the Public Defender of the Second Judicial Circuit as counsel for the appellant. On February 13, 1979, the public defender filed a brief on appellant's behalf, and oral argument was heard on September 14, 1979.

The appellant has presented several points for our review. We conclude that a new trial is required and will discuss only the dispositive issue.

In response to the appellant's demand for discovery, the state provided a witness list showing Betty Jean Strouder as one of its intended witnesses at trial. At trial, the state called Betty Jean Strouder as a witness. Her testimony was damaging to the appellant, both directly and by damaging his credibility. It was contradictory to his testimony.

In cross-examining Betty Jean Strouder, attorney McKee brought out that she had been charged with the crimes in question, that the charges against her were still pending, and that he was her lawyer. At the end of cross-examination, the following exchange was had among the court, prosecutor and defense counsel:

By the Court: You may stand down.

By Mr. Willis: This witness, your Honor, this witness is charged with the offense of murder in the first degree, and at this time the State would nolle prosequi any and all cases that are pending against this defendant. She is free to go.

By the Court: Very well.

By Mr. McKee: Is she granted immunity as far as any other charges?

By Mr. Willis: I believe that's statutory.

By the Court: In other words, you are dismissing the case against this defendant, arising out of this incident?

By Mr. Willis: Yes, your Honor.

By the Court: Very well. You are free to go.

The sixth amendment right to the assistance of counsel contemplates legal representation that is effective and unimpaired by the existence of conflicting interests being represented by a single attorney. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); Baker v. State, 202 So.2d 563 (Fla.1967). Since Betty Jean Strouder and the appellant were both charged with these crimes, there was a strong probability of a conflict between their interests at the time the court appointed McKee to represent them. This conflict became more substantial and apparent to McKee at the time he learned that the state might use Strouder's testimony. The conflict was again revealed to the court when Strouder gave her damaging testimony and stated on cross-examination that McKee was her attorney.

The state argues that reversal cannot be ordered on this ground since there was no defense objection to representation or motion for separate representation. To deny a motion for separate representation, where a risk of conflicting interests exists, is reversible error. Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 98 S.Ct. 1173, 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978). Even in the absence of an objection or motion below, however, where actual conflict of interest or prejudice to the appellant is shown, the court's action in making the joint...

To continue reading

Request your trial
50 cases
  • Lige v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida
    • 22 Octubre 2015
    ...present; however, the record did not clearly show that defendant was unrepresented by counsel at the lineup), with Foster v. State, 387 So. 2d 344, 345-46 (Fla. 1980) (reversing conviction on direct appeal where record demonstrated counsel's representation was impaired by conflicting intere......
  • Gore v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 19 Abril 2001
    ...of counsel claims on direct appeal where counsel's representation has been impaired by conflicting interests. See Foster v. State, 387 So.2d 344, 345-46 (Fla. 1980); see also Robinson v. State, 702 So.2d 213, 215-17 (Fla.1997) (counsel ineffective for not preparing for trial, lying to the j......
  • Ortiz v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • 4 Marzo 2013
    ...728-29 (8th Cir. 2012). In Florida, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel can be raised on direct appeal. See Foster v. State, 387 So. 2d 344, 345-46 (Fla. 1980); see also Robinson v. State, 702 So. 2d 213, 215-17 (Fla. 1997)(counsel ineffective for not preparing for trial, lying to t......
  • McCrae v. State, 67629
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 18 Junio 1987
    ...that affected or must be presumed to have affected the outcome. See Porter v. State, 478 So.2d 33, 35 (Fla.1985); Foster v. State, 387 So.2d 344, 345 (Fla.1980). 1 We simply hold that no deficiency of performance by defense counsel is shown on this Appellant argues that his counsel was inef......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Unpreserved issues in criminal appeals.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 76 No. 7, July 2002
    • 1 Julio 2002
    ...of interest because he represented both the defendant and a codefendant who entered a plea and testified for the state. Foster v. State, 387 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 1980). The district courts have found ineffectiveness on direct appeal in the following circumstances: failing to file a meritorious ......
  • Litigating the ghost of Gideon in Florida: separation of powers as a tool to achieve indigent defense reform.
    • United States
    • Missouri Law Review Vol. 75 No. 3, June 2010
    • 22 Junio 2010
    ...Amendment cases hold that there is a correlative right to representation that is free from conflicts of interest."); Foster v. State, 387 So. 2d 344, 345 (Fla. 1980) ("The sixth amendment right to the assistance of counsel contemplates legal representation that is effective and unimpaired b......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT