Four Maple Drive Realty Corp. v. Abrams

Decision Date17 January 1957
Citation140 N.E.2d 870,2 N.Y.2d 837,159 N.Y.S.2d 976
Parties, 140 N.E.2d 870 FOUR MAPLE DRIVE REALTY CORP., Appellant, v. Charles ABRAMS, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent, and Harold Kelly et al., Intervenors-Respondents.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Landlord brought proceeding under the Civil Practice Act, § 1283 et seq., against the State Rent Administrator to review determination of the State Rent Administrator denying protest with respect to adjustment of maximum rents.

The Court, Cortland A. Johnson, J., entered an order dismissing the proceeding, and the landlord appealed.

The Appellate Division, 2 A.D.2d 753, 153 N.Y.S.2d 747, affirmed the order and held that Section of the Rent Law of 1954, McK.Unconsol.Laws, § 8584, subd. 4(a)(1), providing that, in adjustment of maximum rents where rental is less than six per cent of valuation of property, ratio which assessed valuation bears to full valuation shall be computed by using equalization rate established by State Board of Equalization and Assessment for use in placing special franchise assessments on assessment rolls completed in 1953, was not...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Sweeney v. Cannon
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 29, 1965
    ...851, 122 N.E.2d 743; Matter of Four Maple Drive Realty Corp. v. Abrams, 2 A.D.2d 753, 153 N.Y.S.2d 747, appeal dismissed 2 N.Y.2d 837, 159 N.Y.S.2d 976, 140 N.E.2d 870, appeal dismissed 355 U.S. 14, 78 S.Ct. 22, 2 L.Ed.2d 21; Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co., 274 N.Y. 271, 280, 8 N.E.2......
  • Bucho Holding Co. v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • July 6, 1962
    ...2 A.D.2d 753, 153 N.Y.S.2d 747, motion for leave to app. den. 2 N.Y.2d 707, 163 N.Y.S.2d XC, 138 N.E.2d 345, app. dism. 2 N.Y.2d 837, 159 N.Y.S.2d 976, 140 N.E.2d 870, app. dism. 355 U.S. 14, 78 S.Ct. 22, 2 L.Ed.2d 21; Matter of Baldwin Gardens v. Weaver, 2 A.D.2d 753, 153 N.Y.S.2d 610, mot......
  • Roosevelt Raceway, Inc. v. Nassau County
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 9, 1966
    ...133 N.E.2d 817; Matter of Four Maple Drive Realty Corp. v. Abrams, 2 A.D.2d 753, 754, 153 N.Y.S.2d 747, 750, app. dsmd. 2 N.Y.2d 837, 159 N.Y.S.2d 976, 140 N.E.2d 870, app. dsmd. 355 U.S. 14, 78 S.Ct. 22, 2 L.Ed.2d 21; Spatt v. City of New York, 13 N.Y.2d 618, 240 N.Y.S.2d 605, 191 N.E.2d 9......
  • Johnson v. Space Saver Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 27, 1997
    ...function" (Four Maple Drive Realty Corp. v. Abrams, 2 A.D.2d 753, 754, 153 N.Y.S.2d 747 [2d Dept.1956], app. dism. 2 N.Y.2d 837, 159 N.Y.S.2d 976, 140 N.E.2d 870 [1957], app. dism. 355 U.S. 14, 78 S.Ct. 22, 2 L.Ed.2d 21 [1957] ). Thus viewed, this Court agrees with Justice Rappaport's concl......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT