Fowler v. Duhme
Decision Date | 10 January 1896 |
Docket Number | 16,713 |
Citation | 42 N.E. 623,143 Ind. 248 |
Parties | Fowler et al. v. Duhme et al |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From the White Circuit Court.
The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Stuart Bros. & Hammond, Sellers & Uhl and Winter & Elam for appellants.
E. W Kittredge, A. C. Harris, Gould & Eldridge and L. A. Cox for appellees.
On the 29th day of July, 1884, Moses Fowler, then sixty-nine years of age, was possessed of considerable wealth, consisting of near 18,000 acres of farm lands in Benton county, 2,000 acres in the counties of Tippecanoe and White, between 900 and 1,000 lots in the town of Fowler, city property in Lafayette, and personal property of more than $ 850,000. He and his wife, the appellant Eliza Fowler, had become estranged, and were living apart. His then living children were the appellant James M. Fowler, a married man more than forty years of age, and the father of children, Annis E. Chase, a married daughter, whose only child was the appellee, Moses Fowler Chase, then but six years of age, and the appellee, Ophelia M. Fowler, now Duhme, then being twenty-nine years of age, and unmarried.
On that day, said Moses Fowler executed his last will by which he disposed of his entire estate. Thereafter the said Annis E. Chase departed this life, leaving as her only heirs at law, her said son, and the appellee, Frederick S. Chase, her husband. After the death of said Annis E. Chase, the said Moses Fowler executed a codicil to said will, which will and codicil were as follows:
M. Fowler. [Seal].
W. DeWitt Wallace.
M. Fowler.
"Signed and acknowledged by said Moses Fowler as a codicil to his last will and testament, in our presence and signed by us at his request, in his presence, and in the presence of each other.
Charles B. Phelps.
W. DeWitt Wallace."
Moses Fowler died on the 20th day of August, 1889, and said Eliza Fowler, as his widow, James M. Fowler, his son, Ophelia Fowler Duhme, his daughter, then married, and Moses Fowler Chase, his grandson, survived him as his only heirs at law.
The will and codicil were duly probated, and said widow elected to reject the provision made for her by said will, and to take her interest in said estate as provided by law. Following the probating of the will, and said election by the widow, she, said Eliza Fowler, instituted a proceeding to contest and set aside said will, which proceeding was certified to, and became pending in the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Indiana. At that time various disagreements existed between the devisees, and counsel representing their interests, as to the proper construction of said will, as to the ownership of various valuable properties, the legal title to which was in James M. Fowler as to parts, and in Frederick S. Chase as to parts, the equitable title in which, it was claimed by some, was in said Moses Fowler; the legal title to parts being in said Moses Fowler, and the equitable title claimed by certain of the devisees; as to numerous gifts and advancements to the testators' children, and other questions threatening the peace, good will and financial interests of the members of the testator's family. With these disagreements pending, suit was instituted for partition. At this point a compromise was effected, by which all of the disputed questions, excepting that as to the construction of the will, were amicably adjusted, said suit to contest the will was dismissed, partition was had, the widow was given the fee in one-third of the real estate, $ 15,000 of the personalty, and an annuity payable by James M. Fowler, Ophelia Fowler Duhme and Moses Fowler Chase, and the two children and the grandchild were given each the two-ninths, in value of the real estate, and a like proportion of the personal, after deducting and crediting to the various legatees certain sums agreed upon. In this settlement the adults for themselves, and said grandson by his guardian, upon the order of the circuit court having jurisdiction, concurred. There yet remained a question as to the character of title, which, by the provisions of the will, the said James M. Fowler, Ophelia Fowler Duhme, and Moses Fowler Chase, obtained and held in the lands so set off to them in partition, said question arising upon the construction of clause a, item three, of the will as above set forth. It was insisted by some that the death, in said clause referred to, was a death during the life of the testator, while by others it was maintained that such death was intended by the testator to mean a death after his death. The former proposition was agreed to, as a part of said family settlement, by all of the devisees, excepting said grandson, whose guardian was denied the right, by said circuit court, to join in that part of said settlement.
Thereupon this suit was instituted by Ophelia Fowler Duhme and her husband against James M. Fowler, Eva G. Fowler (his...
To continue reading
Request your trial