Francis v. Barton, Nos. 78068

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM; SHAW; BARKETT, J., concurs specially with an opinion, in which KOGAN; BARKETT; KOGAN
Citation581 So.2d 583
PartiesBobby Marion FRANCIS, Petitioner, v. Thomas L. BARTON, etc., et al., Respondents. Bobby Marion FRANCIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. 581 So.2d 583, 16 Fla. L. Week. S461
Decision Date15 June 1991
Docket Number78074,Nos. 78068

Page 583

581 So.2d 583
Bobby Marion FRANCIS, Petitioner,
v.
Thomas L. BARTON, etc., et al., Respondents.
Bobby Marion FRANCIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 78068, 78074.
581 So.2d 583, 16 Fla. L. Week. S461
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 15, 1991.
Certiorari Denied June 25, 1991.
See 111 S.Ct.
2879.

Billy H. Nolas and Julie D. Naylor, Ocala, for petitioner/appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Ralph Barreira, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondents/appellee.

Steven M. Goldstein, Tallahassee, amicus curiae for Volunteer Lawyers' Resource Center.

PER CURIAM.

Francis, a prisoner under death warrant, petitions this Court for writ of habeas corpus, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for postconviction relief, and requests a stay of his execution, currently scheduled for June 19, 1991. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, Sec. 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const.; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Because all of the issues raised in this successive postconviction petition and appeal from a successive postconviction motion are procedurally barred, we deny all relief.

We affirmed Francis' conviction of first-degree murder and sentence of death on direct appeal. Francis v. State, 473 So.2d 672 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1094, 106 S.Ct. 870, 88 L.Ed.2d 908 (1986). After the governor signed Francis' first death

Page 584

warrant, we denied his petition for writ of habeas corpus, Francis v. Dugger, 514 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987), and affirmed the trial court's denial of his first motion for postconviction relief. Francis v. State, 529 So.2d 670 (Fla.1988). Following the signing of his second death warrant, the federal courts denied Francis' petition for writ of habeas corpus. Francis v. Dugger, 908 F.2d 696 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1696, 114 L.Ed.2d 90 (1991). The governor recently signed Francis' third death warrant, prompting the filing of his second 3.850 motion with the trial court and his second habeas corpus petition with this Court.

In this second 3.850 motion Francis raised the following claims: 1) improper jury override; 2) the state knowingly presented misleading evidence concerning the witness elimination/disrupt or hinder governmental function or enforcement of law aggravating factor; 3) finding witness elimination in aggravation violated Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970); and 4) trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to investigate and prepare for the penalty phase. The trial court correctly found these issues procedurally barred and denied relief without holding an evidentiary hearing.

Francis raised the first issue on direct appeal and in his prior state and federal habeas corpus petitions. Issues raised and disposed of on direct appeal are procedurally barred in postconviction proceedings. Francis, 529 So.2d at 672; Francis, 514 So.2d at 1097. The cases Francis now relies on, e.g., Parker v. Dugger, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 731, 112 L.Ed.2d 812 (1991); Cochran...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 practice notes
  • Clark, In re, No. S022475
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • July 29, 1993
    ...20.2; Blount v. State (Ala.Cr.App.1990) 572 So.2d 498, 501; Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 3.850; Francis v. Barton (Fla.1991) 581 So.2d 583; Illinois Revised Statutes 1965, ch. 38, paragraph 122-3; People v. Polansky (1968) 39 Ill.2d 84, 233 N.E.2d 374; Kentucky Rules of Crimina......
  • Freeman v. State, No. SC79651
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • June 8, 2000
    ...aggravator instruction on direct appeal. See Freeman, 563 So.2d at 76. Thus, this issue is procedurally barred. See Francis v. Barton, 581 So.2d 583 (Fla.1991); Porter v. Dugger, 559 So.2d 201 (Fla.1990). Appellate counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to convince the Court to rule in a......
  • Knight v. State, No. SC03-631.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • November 3, 2005
    ...verdict forms and necessary vote counts could have and should have been raised on appeal and are procedurally barred. Francis v. Barton[, 581 So.2d 583 (Fla.1991)], Accordingly, this claim is denied without evidentiary hearing. CLAIM XI MR. MUHAMMAD'S SENTENCING JURY WAS MISLED BY COMMENTS,......
  • State v. Riechmann, No. SC89564
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • February 24, 2000
    ...because he could and should have raised it on direct appeal, since by trial's end he was aware of the statements. See Francis v. Barton, 581 So.2d 583 (Fla.1991). Notwithstanding, the trial court found that even if disclosed, there was no reasonable probability that a different result would......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
21 cases
  • Clark, In re, No. S022475
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • July 29, 1993
    ...20.2; Blount v. State (Ala.Cr.App.1990) 572 So.2d 498, 501; Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 3.850; Francis v. Barton (Fla.1991) 581 So.2d 583; Illinois Revised Statutes 1965, ch. 38, paragraph 122-3; People v. Polansky (1968) 39 Ill.2d 84, 233 N.E.2d 374; Kentucky Rules of Crimina......
  • Freeman v. State, No. SC79651
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • June 8, 2000
    ...aggravator instruction on direct appeal. See Freeman, 563 So.2d at 76. Thus, this issue is procedurally barred. See Francis v. Barton, 581 So.2d 583 (Fla.1991); Porter v. Dugger, 559 So.2d 201 (Fla.1990). Appellate counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to convince the Court to rule in a......
  • Knight v. State, No. SC03-631.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • November 3, 2005
    ...verdict forms and necessary vote counts could have and should have been raised on appeal and are procedurally barred. Francis v. Barton[, 581 So.2d 583 (Fla.1991)], Accordingly, this claim is denied without evidentiary hearing. CLAIM XI MR. MUHAMMAD'S SENTENCING JURY WAS MISLED BY COMMENTS,......
  • State v. Riechmann, No. SC89564
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • February 24, 2000
    ...because he could and should have raised it on direct appeal, since by trial's end he was aware of the statements. See Francis v. Barton, 581 So.2d 583 (Fla.1991). Notwithstanding, the trial court found that even if disclosed, there was no reasonable probability that a different result would......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT