Frango v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
| Decision Date | 02 February 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D03-3261.,3D03-3261. |
| Citation | 891 So.2d 1208,2005 AMC 804 |
| Parties | Iris FRANGO and Joseph Frango, Appellants, v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Sarnoff & Bayer, Miami, for appellants.
Rodriguez, Aronson & Essington, and Domingo Rodriguez, Miami, and Andre M. Picciurro, for appellee.
Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Iris and Joseph Frango appeal the entry of two adverse final summary judgments. We reverse the summary judgment for Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. ("RCCL") on Iris Frango's claim for injuries, but affirm the summary judgment for RCCL on Joseph Frango's claim for loss of consortium.
On November 15, 2001, the Frangos boarded appellee RCCL's SS Galaxy in San Juan, Puerto Rico. While the ship was on the high seas, the automatic sliding doors that lead into the ship's lounge closed on Iris Frango's face. This incident occurred during the early evening hours as Iris Frango entered the lounge and turned her head around to find her husband, who was walking behind her. The doors broke her nose and caused other injuries to her face. The Frangos sued RCCL for negligence. Pandelis Kordonis, RCCL's Chief electronic engineer, testified that on one occasion, his assistant stood very close to the closed doors to talk to him and the doors failed to sense his assistant's presence. He also testified that when the doors sense a line of people, the doors will remain open all of the time. However, if a person remained stationary for a moment just prior to the entryway of the doors, the sensor could lose that person. The person could then walk directly into the doors.
Mark A. Young, an architectural civil engineer, inspected and tested the automatic doors and opined that the sensors and doors were not properly installed and maintained. He found that the sensor was missing a lens cover which could have allowed the doors to remain closed. He also opined that RCCL could have executed measures to prevent the incident from occurring through the installation of emergency switches which could have allowed the doors to remain open in anticipation of a steady flow of passengers.
RCCL subsequently moved for summary judgment against Joseph Frango's loss of consortium claim. RCCL argued that general maritime law did not recognize loss of consortium claims for the spouses of passengers who are injured while on the high seas. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of RCCL.
RCCL also moved for final summary judgment against Iris Frango's claim. RCCL argued that Iris Frango was the sole and proximate cause of her injuries. The trial court granted RCCL's motion finding that Iris Frango was 100% at fault for her injuries. The trial court denied the Frangos' motion for rehearing and entered final judgment as against both Iris and Joseph Frango.
Under general maritime law, RCCL owed the Frangos the duty of exercising reasonable care under the circumstances. See Kermarec v. Compagnie General Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625, 632, 79 S.Ct. 406, 3 L.Ed.2d 550 (1959). As in Corona v. Costa Crociere S.P.A., 844 So.2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), "[b]ased on the record now before us, we conclude that the defendant cruise line has not carried its burden of demonstrating the nonexistence of any disputed issue of material fact." We cannot agree that by briefly stopping to look back at her husband, Iris Frango was entirely responsible for the accident.
As to the loss of consortium, we have previously stated in Norwegian Cruise Lines, Ltd. v. Zareno, 712 So.2d 791, 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) that a state court may apply state law to a maritime action so long as there is no conflict with federal maritime law. Florida law recognizes a claim for loss of consortium, so the issue is whether it would conflict with federal maritime law. We conclude that it would.
In the case of In re Amtrack "Sunset Ltd." Train Crash in Bayou Canot, Ala., on Sept. 22, 1993, 121 F.3d 1421 (11th Cir.1997), the court stated that general maritime law does not allow claims for loss of consortium to non-seamen. The court first held that the district court erred in finding that Alabama's wrongful death statute governed the wrongful death claims asserted in this action; it concluded that the federal maritime interests outweighed Alabama's interests in having its wrongful death s...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Santos v. Am. Cruise Ferries, Inc.
...“would effectively reward a tortfeasor for killing, rather than merely injuring his victim”); see also Frango v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 891 So.2d 1208, 1211 (Fla.App.2005) (finding Chan's reasoning persuasive to hold that general maritime law does not allow recovery of non-pecuniary......
-
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Cox
...does not flatly contradict maritime law.” Zareno, 712 So.2d at 793.See also Carlisle, 953 So.2d at 464;Frango v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 891 So.2d 1208, 1210 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). A review of the pertinent case law reveals that, in addition to Florida's federal court decisions holding ......
-
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Cox
...subsequent to Modesto may support RCCL's position that this Court "impliedly" receded from Modesto. See Frango v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 891 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005);3 Chapman v. Laitner, 809 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002);4 Hilton Oil Transp. v. Oil Transp. Co., S.A., 659 So. 2......
-
Gandhi v. Carnival Corp.
...1398 (9th Cir. 1994); Nichols v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., 17 F.3d 119, 122-23 (5th Cir. 1994); Frango v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 891 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005). The Supreme Court held in Miles v. Apex Marine Corp. that damages for loss of society are not recoverable u......
-
Chapter § 3.02 CRUISE SHIPS
...Smith v. Carnival Corporation, 584 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2008). State Courts: Florida: Frango v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 891 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. App. 2005) (automatic doors close on passenger's face; "We find that one of the aims of maritime law is to promote uniformity in the ex......