Frankel v. City of Miami Beach
Decision Date | 18 June 1974 |
Docket Number | Nos. 73--962,73--963,s. 73--962 |
Citation | 296 So.2d 605 |
Parties | E. J. FRANKEL et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation, created and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeals from Circuit Court, Dade County; Rhea P. Grossman, Judge.
Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward, Miami Beach, for appellants.
Joseph A. Wanick, City Atty., and Lee H. Schillinger, Asst. City Atty., for appellee.
Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Affirmed. See Curtis Publishing Company v. Bader, Fla.App.1972, 266 So.2d 78; Federated Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Pasco, Fla.App.1973, 275 So.2d 46; Shell Oil Company v. State, Fla.App.1974, 295 So.2d 648; Eisen v. Carlisle & Jaquelin (1974) --- U.S. ---, 94 S.Ct. 2140, 40 L.Ed.2d 732, 42 Law Week 4804.
I respectfully dissent from the holding that appellants' case was not a proper one for a class action. It appears to me that this action against the City of Miami Beach falls exactly within the rule announced by the Supreme Court of Florida in Tenney v. City of Miami Beach, 152 Fla. 126, 11 So.2d 188 (1942). I would therefore reverse the order which dismissed the class action aspect of the cause.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Frankel v. City of Miami Beach
...for a writ of certiorari which alleges that the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Frankel v. City of Miami Beach, 296 So.2d 605 (Fla.App.3d 1974) conflicts with this Court's decision in Tenney v. City of Miami Beach, 152 Fla. 126, 11 So.2d 188 (1942). We have juri......
-
Frankel v. City of Miami Beach, s. 73-962
...JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge. ORDER ON MANDATE PER CURIAM. WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on June 18, 1974 (296 So.2d 605) affirming the order of the circuit court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; WHEREAS, on review of this court's jud......