Franklin v. Bradshaw, No. 09–3389.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | BOGGS |
| Citation | 695 F.3d 439 |
| Parties | Antonio FRANKLIN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Respondent–Appellee. |
| Docket Number | No. 09–3389. |
| Decision Date | 19 September 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
152 practice notes
-
Woods v. Comm'r of Corr., AC 41987
...so novel that failure to raise it in state court proceedings procedurally defaulted in federal habeas proceeding); Franklin v. Bradshaw , 695 F.3d 439, 454–55 (6th Cir. 2012) (procedural default applies to evolving standards argument where petitioner failed to raise equal protection claim i......
-
McKnight v. Bobby, Case No. 2:09-cv-059
...any event, The Sixth Circuit has repeatedly held that the language McKnight challenges does not violate due process. Franklin v. Bradshaw, 695 F.3d 439, 456 (6th Cir. 2012); White v. Mitchell, 431 F.3d 517, 534 (6th Cir. 2005); Coleman v. Mitchell, 268 F.3d 417, 437 (6th Cir. 2001); Buell v......
-
State v. Dunlap, Docket No. 32773/37270
...punishment without regard to the individualized balance between aggravation and mitigation in a specific case"); Franklin v. Bradshaw, 695 F.3d 439, 455 (6th Cir. 2012) (noting absence of case law extending Atkins to prohibit the execution of those with mental illnesses); In re Neville, 440......
-
Stevens v. Schweitzer, CASE NO. 3:17 CV 1245
...of a state court, factual determinations made by state courts are presumed correct. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1); see also Franklin v. Bradshaw, 695 F.3d 439, 447 (6th Cir. 2012) ("State-court factual findings are presumed correct unless rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.") The Page 2 Thi......
Request a trial to view additional results
152 cases
-
Woods v. Comm'r of Corr., AC 41987
...so novel that failure to raise it in state court proceedings procedurally defaulted in federal habeas proceeding); Franklin v. Bradshaw , 695 F.3d 439, 454–55 (6th Cir. 2012) (procedural default applies to evolving standards argument where petitioner failed to raise equal protection claim i......
-
McKnight v. Bobby, Case No. 2:09-cv-059
...any event, The Sixth Circuit has repeatedly held that the language McKnight challenges does not violate due process. Franklin v. Bradshaw, 695 F.3d 439, 456 (6th Cir. 2012); White v. Mitchell, 431 F.3d 517, 534 (6th Cir. 2005); Coleman v. Mitchell, 268 F.3d 417, 437 (6th Cir. 2001); Buell v......
-
State v. Dunlap, Docket No. 32773/37270
...punishment without regard to the individualized balance between aggravation and mitigation in a specific case"); Franklin v. Bradshaw, 695 F.3d 439, 455 (6th Cir. 2012) (noting absence of case law extending Atkins to prohibit the execution of those with mental illnesses); In re Neville, 440......
-
Stevens v. Schweitzer, CASE NO. 3:17 CV 1245
...of a state court, factual determinations made by state courts are presumed correct. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1); see also Franklin v. Bradshaw, 695 F.3d 439, 447 (6th Cir. 2012) ("State-court factual findings are presumed correct unless rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.") The Page 2 Thi......
Request a trial to view additional results