Franklin v. Doyle
Decision Date | 09 July 2012 |
Docket Number | CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-931 |
Parties | JOHN B. FRANKLIN v. BRYAN DOYLE, ET AL |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas |
G. MITCH WOODS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pending before the Court is defendants' Jefferson County ("Jefferson County") and G. Mitch Woods' ("Woods") Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry no. 57). Defendants seek summary judgment as to Plaintiff John B. Franklin's ("Plaintiff") civil rights claims for excessive use of force pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Having reviewed the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that defendants' motion for summary judgment should be granted.
The above-styled action was originally referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case by United States District Judge Marcia A. Crone. Consent of the parties to proceed before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) was entered on January 31, 2011.
Plaintiff, John B. Franklin is currently a resident of Walker County, Texas.1 Defendants Doyle and Johnson were former officers of the Jefferson County Jail where the incident at issue in this suit took place. Defendant Jefferson County is a municipality which operates the Jefferson County Jail and employed Doyle and Johnson. Defendant Woods is the Sheriff of Jefferson County and is responsible for the operation of the Jefferson County Jail.
The following facts are derived from plaintiff's first amended complaint (docket entry no. 32-2).
On March 11, 2011, plaintiff filed his motion for leave to file his amended complaint which was subsequently granted on June 1, 2011. Plaintiff filed his amended complaint seeking relief for violations of his 4th and 14th Amendment rights and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, plaintiff alleges he was subjected to excessive use of force in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments when officers handcuffed and bound him to the backboard and then proceeded to tase and beat him, despite him having already been restrained, while defendants allegedly knowingly subjected him to a substantial risk of physical harm and to unnecessary pain caused by striking his neck several times. Id. In addition, plaintiff argues the actions of defendants, done under color of law and official authority, intentionally, and with complete, deliberate, conscious and callous indifference to plaintiff's constitutional rights, deprived him of his right to be free from inexcusable and arbitrary use of excessive force, proximately causing him injury. Id. Finally, plaintiff contends defendant Jefferson County, as a matter of policy and custom, with deliberate conscious and callous indifference to citizens' right to be free from the use of excessive force, authorized, tolerated, and institutionalized the practices and ratified the alleged illegal misconduct, in part through failure to adequately train and supervise its personnel, proximately causing plaintiff the deprivation of thosefederal rights resulting in the injury he suffered. Id.
Plaintiff also asserts a cause of action for assault under Texas common law and seeks injunctive relief, permanently "enjoining defendants Jefferson County and Woods, their employees, agents, servants, successors-in-office, and all those acting in concert with them, from continuing to exert arbitrary and excessive use of force." Id. Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages in addition to attorneys' fees and costs. Plaintiff also argues he is entitled to a declaratory judgment.
Defendants move for summary judgment and outline the statement of the issues as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial