Frasch v. City of Prichard
Citation | 224 Ala. 410,140 So. 394 |
Decision Date | 21 January 1932 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 688. |
Parties | FRASCH v. CITY OF PRICHARD ET AL. |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Rehearing Denied March 31, 1932.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; J. Blocker Thornton Judge.
Taxpayer's bill by Edward B. Frasch against the City of Prichard, the individuals composing the City Council, and the J. B. McCrary Engineering Corporation, to enjoin performance of a contract for municipal improvements. From a decree sustaining a demurrer to the bill, complainant appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Armbrecht Hand & Twitty, of Mobile, for appellant.
Joseph G. Bowen, of Mobile, and Leon G. Brooks, of Brewton, for appellees.
This is a bill by a resident citizen and taxpayer seeking to enjoin the performance of a contract entered into by the respondents, the city of Prichard, a municipal corporation having less than 6,000 inhabitants, and the J. B. McCrary Engineering Corporation, for the construction of certain paving, storm and sanitary sewers, sidewalks, curbs, gutters etc., in pursuance of local improvement ordinances, adopted by the mayor and city council, providing for the improvement of certain streets.
Demurrers filed by the defendants to the bill were sustained, and from that decree the complainant prosecutes this appeal.
After the adoption of said ordinances, notice was given by publication as required by section 2182 of the Code as amended by the Municipal Public Improvement Act, approved September 10, 1927, Acts 1927, p. 760, § 11, inviting competitive bids for the work. The published notice, after stating that sealed bids would be received on a specified date, describing in a general way, the character and approximate quantity of such work, and, as to some of the work, the type of material to be used, further stated: etc.
The only bid submitted was the bid of the respondent McCrary Engineering Corporation, which was accompanied by the following proposal:
The contract referred to in the proposal, the execution of which was made a prerequisite of the validity of the proposal and the contract for the work, stipulates, inter alia: (Italics supplied.)
The stipulations in the contract for the work, material to the questions presented, are:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Jasper v. Sanders
... ... provides for the final notice to be given by advertisement ... for bids (Holley v. Brunson, Mayor, 221 Ala. 572, ... 130 So. 173, Frasch v. City of Prichard, 224 Ala ... 410, 140 So. 394). It is further required by section 2190 of ... the Code that, when the improvement made is ... ...
-
Moorer v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co.
... ... 119 Ala. 84, 24 So. 723; Weeden v. Asbury, 223 Ala ... 687, 138 So. 267; Frasch v. City of Prichard, 224 ... Ala. 410, 140 So. 394; Albert v. Nixon, 229 Ala ... 273, 156 So ... ...
-
Marbury-Pattillo Const. Co., Inc. v. Bayside Warehouse Co.
...In this regard, see, inter alia Hunter-Benn & Company v. Bassett Lumber Company, 224 Ala. 215, 139 So. 348 (1932); Frasch v. City of Prichard, 224 Ala. 410, 140 So. 394 (1932); Conway v. Andrews, 286 Ala. 28, 236 So.2d 687 (1970); Admiral Paint Company v. Goltzman (La.App., 1971), 254 So.2d......
-
Cole v. Yearwood
... ... 267; ... Hunter-Benn & Co. v. Bassett Lumber Co., 224 Ala. 215, ... 139 So. 348; Frasch v. City of Prichard, 224 Ala ... 410, 140 So. 394; Albert v. Nixon, 229 Ala. 273, 156 ... So ... ...