Frazelle-Foster v. Foster
Citation | 250 Md.App. 52,248 A.3d 1089 |
Decision Date | 31 March 2021 |
Docket Number | No. 2716, Sept. Term, 2018,2716, Sept. Term, 2018 |
Parties | Donna FRAZELLE-FOSTER v. Preston H. FOSTER, Sr. |
Court | Court of Special Appeals of Maryland |
Submitted by: Ayo M. Stevens (Law Offices of Ayo M. Stevens, LLC, on the brief), Upper Marlboro, MD, for Appellant.
No submission on behalf of appellee.
Panel: Fader, C.J., Leahy, Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.
This appeal emanates from a divorce proceeding initiated in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County by Donna Frazelle-Foster against Preston H. Foster, Sr. Following a hearing, the circuit court denied Donna's1 complaint for absolute divorce, or, in the alternative, for limited divorce on grounds of cruelty of treatment and constructive desertion. Donna filed a timely appeal. The circuit court, she claims, erred by denying her complaint for absolute divorce on the ground of cruelty of treatment.2
We vacate the judgment of the circuit court. We conclude that the court failed to consider the more recent and more inclusive standards required to prove cruelty of treatment as a ground for divorce under Maryland Code (1984, 2020 Repl. Vol.), Family Law Article ("FL"), sections 7-102(a)(1) and 7-103(a)(6). We hold that "cruelty of treatment" as a ground for limited or absolute divorce does not require physical violence or the threat of physical violence, and may be based upon verbal and psychological abuse which "is calculated to seriously impair the health or permanently destroy the happiness of the other." Das v. Das , 133 Md. App. 1, 33, 754 A.2d 441 (2000) (quoting Scheinin v. Scheinin, 200 Md. 282, 289, 89 A.2d 609 (1952) ).
Donna and Preston first married in North Carolina in 1982 and moved to Maryland that same year. They divorced in Maryland in 1988. Three years later, Donna and Preston remarried and have lived in Maryland throughout their second marriage. They have one son who was born in 1996.
At the time of their remarriage in 1991, Preston was employed by the United States Department of State, and Donna was employed as an assistant supervisor in the Prince George's County Department of Social Services. Eventually, Preston accepted a position with the United States Agency for International Development where he remained until his retirement in 2016. Throughout the parties’ second marriage, Preston has been the primary "breadwinner." According to Donna, she left her job in 2002 to care for their son because Preston traveled frequently for work. She has since remained unemployed.
Donna and Preston have resided in the same marital home in Mitchellville, Maryland, since 1998. In 2012, the couple ceased having sexual relations and now live in separate parts of the home.
On May 1, 2017, Preston filed an answer, requesting that the complaint be denied.
The court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Donna's claim for absolute divorce or, in the alternative, limited divorce on January 25, 2018. Both parties were represented by counsel and were the only witnesses.
Donna testified that the parties began experiencing marital problems in 1998, a few years after the birth of their son, because Preston "began to make major household decisions without [her] input." Donna explained that the parties’ problems have "escalated over the years." Specifically, Donna testified:
Donna then introduced into evidence a letter, admitted into evidence as Plaintiff's Ex. 1, that she received from Preston. The letter stated:
Donna testified that she felt "humiliated" and "hurt" by the letter. It "tore [her] up to know that [those were] his sentiments." According to Donna, Preston further humiliated her a few years later, in 2006, by reading the note aloud to neighbors during a dinner at Donna and Preston's house.
Donna related that Preston wrote other similar notes that hurt her feelings and made her feel "worthless." When she Preston frequently calls her "offensive names in front of their son," in an attempt, Donna guessed, to "silence [her]." In fact, Donna testified, Preston demeans her on a regular basis for "the person [she] happen[s] to be, the way [she] walk[s], the way she stand[s]." Furthermore, she said, Preston never leaves her alone with her friends and monitors her calls.
Finances are a constant source of strife between Donna and Preston. Donna reiterated that Preston is the primary "breadwinner," and that her income consists of $645.69 from the State of Maryland.4 She explained that because Preston is responsible for the family's food, personal care needs, and their son's tuition, he "controls [their] whereabouts, because you can't do much in the world without money." Donna testified that Preston "controls everything" 5 and "let it be known to both [Donna and their son] that [they] have to do what he says." Donna recounted that, in January of 2017, Preston mostly stopped supporting her financially, requiring her to "beg" for small amounts of money for basic necessities. He also canceled her Costco membership card without telling her.
Donna imparted that Preston's financial control affects her relationship with her son. She explained that, when Preston is not at home, her relationship with her son is "pleasant," but that the relationship is strained when Preston is present. This strain, Donna opined, is the result of "pressure" imposed on their son due to Preston's financial control over the family—he "pay[s] all the bills and will withhold" and "retaliate" if their son does not behave in the way that he wants.
The letter was signed by Donna, Preston, and their son.
Donna described one incident of violence in February 2006 when Preston "pushed [her] down to the floor, and [she] called police." No charges were filed. According to Donna, "the call was enough that [Preston] did not put his hands on me physically again, although he mentally hurts me every opportunity he gets." She later noted, however, that she remains fearful that Preston will harm her "physically" and that he has yelled and shouted at her in a way that has made her both "intimidated and fearful." She testified that she...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wright v. Wright
...of cruelty of treatment to include verbal and physical abuse that "threatened [w]ife's physical and emotional well-being." Id. at 39. In Frazelle-Foster, this Court examined the history cruelty as a ground for divorce and the "evolution of our social norms," in Maryland's statutory and deci......