Freedman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6327.
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit) |
Citation | 92 F.2d 150 |
Docket Number | No. 6327.,6327. |
Parties | FREEDMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. |
Decision Date | 23 August 1937 |
92 F.2d 150 (1937)
FREEDMAN
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.*
No. 6327.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
August 23, 1937.
Wm. A. Schnader, of Philadelphia, Pa., and John W. Townsend, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, Norman D. Keller, and Howard P. Locke, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Herbert Pope, of Chicago, Ill., amicus curiæ.
Before BUFFINGTON and BIGGS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the taxpayer from an order of the federal Tax Board assessing income tax against him, and the question involved is: "Was the annual salary of $3,000 received by petitioner in 1932 for services rendered as an attorney in the Department of Justice of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania exempt from the Federal Income tax?" The facts, which are not in dispute, are thus stated by the Tax Board:
"The department of justice and the department of banking are administrative divisions of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The head of the department of justice is the attorney general and the head of the department of banking is the secretary of banking, these offices being provided for by statute. The attorney general has statutory power `to appoint and fix the compensation of special deputy attorneys general, and special attorneys, to represent the Commonwealth, for any department, board, or commission thereof, in special work or in particular cases.' Purdon's Penna.Stats. title 71, § 296 71 P.S.Pa. § 296. The secretary of banking is by statute given broad powers over banks within the commonwealth. When it appears to him that a bank is in an unsafe or unsound condition he may, after notice and hearing and with the consent of the attorney general, take possession of the business and property of the bank; under certain conditions
"The petitioner was assigned to work under special deputy attorneys general in Philadelphia County in connection with legal matters pertaining to closed banks in that county. Such closed banks were being liquidated by the secretary of banking pursuant to statute. The petitioner's duties consisted of attempting to collect debts due such closed banks, rendering legal opinions to the deputy receivers in charge thereof, handling the legal matters for the banking department that came up from surrounding counties, prosecuting suits in court, consulting with creditors, depositors, and stockholders of closed banks concerning their claims, procuring substitute trustees for trust estates being administered by such banks, preparing, filing, and presenting accounts in the Orphans' Court, preparing data...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Helvering v. Therrell, s. 128
...Revenue, 5 Cir., 88 F.2d 873; McLoughlin v. Com'r of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 89 F.2d 699; Freedman v. Com'r of Internal Revenue, 3 Cir., 92 F.2d 150, state the essential facts—not in dispute; make adequate references to the relevant statutory provisions; and cite numerous authorities. No.......
-
Alsop v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6259.
...that it is "in lieu of alimony." In other words, by it, he wiped out his obligation to pay alimony. Economically it might have been 92 F.2d 150 a good or bad bargain, depending upon future events, but it was a chance which he felt justified in taking. The fact of his wife's remarriage was o......