French v. Harney County
Decision Date | 13 August 1898 |
Parties | FRENCH v. HARNEY COUNTY et al. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Harney county; Morton D. Clifford, Judge.
Proceeding by Peter French against Harney county and others to review proceedings changing an assessment. From a judgment dismissing it, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
Jas. A. Fee, for appellant.
C.W Parrish, Dist. Atty., for respondents.
On October 10, 1896, the board of equalization of Harney county being then in regular session, directed the county clerk to issue a citation to the plaintiff, requiring him to appear before the county court at its next term, and show cause why his assessment of 8,000 head of cattle, valued at $80,000 should not be raised to 15,000 head, of the value of $150,000. Thereafter, and on the same day, it caused to be entered in its record the following order: On October 17th the county clerk issued a citation to the plaintiff, requiring him to appear in the county court on Monday, November 4, 1896, and show cause, if any, why his assessment should not be increased in the respect mentioned in the order of the board, in obedience to which he appeared; and after a hearing the county court found and determined that he was in fact the owner of 12,000 head of cattle in the county, liable to assessment, and increased his assessment accordingly. To reverse and annul such order this proceeding was instituted, and, it having been dismissed by the circuit court, the plaintiff appeals. His contention is that the county court was without jurisdiction to make the order increasing his assessment, because the board of equalization had, as its records affirmatively show, completed the examination and correction of the assessment roll, and equalized the assessment thereon, before its final adjournment.
By section 2778 of the Code, the judge, clerk, and assessor of the several counties of the state are made to constitute a board of equalization, with "power to examine and correct the assessment roll of their respective counties and to increase or reduce the valuation of property assessed"; and such board is required by section 2781 to continue its sittings from...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sparkman v. State
... ... Error ... to Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; F. M. Robles, Judge ... Mandamus ... by the State, on the relation of the Bank of Ybor ... would be a denial of due process. See French v. Harney ... County, 33 Or. 418, 54 P. 211; 37 Cyc. 1096 ... Even if ... the relator ... ...
-
Gay v. City of Eugene
...to the prejudice of some substantial right of the plaintiff. B. & C. Comp. § 597; Tyler v. Smith, 28 Or. 238, 42 P. 518; French v. Harney County, 33 Or. 418, 54 P. 211; Curran v. State (Or.) 99 P. 420. If the adoption the local option law in that county had been effectuated by the passage o......
-
Curran v. State
... ... Appeal ... from Circuit Court, Linn County; William Galloway, Judge ... Writ of ... review by Charles Curran against the ... re-examination by the reviewing court. French v. Harney ... Co., 33 Or. 418, 421, 54 P. 211 ... It is ... insisted ... ...
-
Raper v. Dunn
...99 P. 889 53 Or. 203 RAPER v. DUNN, County Judge, et al. Supreme Court of OregonFebruary 9, 1909 ... Appeal ... from ... Curran v. State (decided ... February 2, 1909) 99 P. 420; French v. Harney ... County, 33 Or. 418, 54 P. 211; Tyler v. State, ... 28 Or. 238, 42 P. 518 ... ...