French v. Wade

Citation102 U.S. 132,26 L.Ed. 44
PartiesFRENCH v. WADE
Decision Date01 October 1880
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.

This was a suit brought March 14, 1878, against Joseph M. French, by the heirs-at-law of Henry F. Wade, Jr., to recover the possession of certain real estate in the city of New Orleans.

Wade was the owner of the property when it was seized and a libel for its condemnation filed in the proper District Court of the United States, under the act of July 17, 1862 (12 Stat. 589), commonly called the Confiscation Acts, and the joint resolution of even date therewith. Id. 627. It was condemned May 6, 1865, as forfeited to the United States, and sold under a writ of venditioni exponas, Oct. 21, 1865. Wade was the purchaser, and he and his wife, by an authentic act passed before S. Magner, notary public, on the thirtieth day of that month, bargained and sold it in fee, with all legal warranties, to French. The latter took possession of it and made valuable improvements.

The act recites that the property was acquired by Wade 'at a sale made by the marshal of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, by virtue of a writ of venditioni exponas to him directed by the District Court of the United States for that district, in the suit entitled. The United States v. One Piece of Ground, & c., the property of Henry F. Wade, Jr., No. 7969 of the docket of said court, as per deed of said marshal, dated the 24th of October, 1865, recorded in the clerk's office of said court in sales-book B, folios 340 and 341, hereto annexed as part hereof; said property belonged to said Wade, Jr., defendant in said suit, for having acquired the same by donation from his father, Henry F. Wade, and his mother, Lucretia Martin, by act passed before Theodore Guyole, late notary, on the 17th of May, 1860, and the same belonged to said donor and his wife, as community property.' Wade died Feb. 24, 1874.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and French sued out this writ of error.

Mr. Benjamin F. Jonas for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. John A. Campbell, contra.

Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

We think the court below was right in holding that this case was governed by that of Wallach et al. v. Van Riswick (92 U.S 202), in which we decided that after a seizure and an adjudicated condemnation and sale under the Confiscation Act of July 17, 1862 (12 Stat. 589), of the lands of one...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Moore v. Waldstein
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 18, 1905
    ...Inter. Stat. § 103; 11 Wall, 493; 169 U.S. 55; 9 Pet. 301; 11 How. 375; 11 Wall. 45; 145 U.S. 593; 113 Ind. 373; 26 Ark. 527; 92 U.S. 202; 102 U.S. 132. White & Altheimer, for The original complaint could not be the foundation for the amendment offered. 42 Ark. 511; 57 Ark. 632; 47 Ark. 301......
  • Illinois Co v. Bosworth
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • January 20, 1890
    ...has been frequently decided. Wallach v. Van Riswick, 92 U. S. 202; Chaffraix v. Shiff, Id. 214; Pike v. Wassell, 94 U. S. 711 French v. Wade, 102 U. S. 132; and see Avegno v. Schmidt, 113 U. S. 293, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 487; Shields v. Schiff, 124 U. S. 351, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 510. But it has been ......
  • Heirs of Ameron Ledoux v. Lavedan
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • May 15, 1899
    ...been frequently decided. "Wallach vs. Van Riswick, 92 U.S. 202; Chaffraix vs. Shiff, 92 U.S. 214; Pike vs. Wassell, 94 U.S. 711; French vs. Wade, 102 U.S. 132 and Avegno Schmidt, 113 U.S. 293; Shields vs. Schiff, 124 U.S. 351. "But it has been regarded as a doubtful question, what became of......
  • Simms v. Wright
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 14, 1900
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT