Fri v. Sierra Club
Decision Date | 11 June 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 72-804,72-804 |
Citation | 93 S.Ct. 2770,37 L.Ed.2d 140,412 U.S. 541 |
Parties | Robert W. FRI, Acting Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, petitioner, v. SIERRA CLUB et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Lawrence G. Wallace, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Bruce J. Terris, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial38 cases
-
Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. Epa, No. 02-658.
...1972), aff'd per curiam, 4 E. R. C. 1815, 2 Env. L. Rep. 20656 (CADC 1972), aff'd by an equally divided court sub nom. Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541 (1973) (per curiam). 3. The PSD program also requires visibility control measures, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7491-7492, not at issue in this 4. As enact......
-
Philadelphia Council of Neighborhood Organizations v. Coleman, Civ. A. No. 77-180.
...F.Supp. 253 (D.D. C.1972), aff'd (per curiam), 4 ERC 1815 (D.C.Cir. 1972), aff'd by an equally divided Court, Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 93 S.Ct. 2770, 37 L.Ed.2d 140 (1973). In that case, plaintiffs sought to enjoin the Administrator of the EPA from approving certain portions of sta......
-
City of Highland Park, Ill. v. Train
...254 (D.D.C.1972), aff'd per curiam, 4 E.R.C. 1815 (D.C.Cir.1972), aff'd by an equally divided Court sub nom., Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 93 S.Ct. 2770, 37 L.Ed.2d 140 (1973). In the Sierra Club case the court held, on motion for preliminary injunction, that the Administrator had a no......
-
United States v. State of Wash., Civ. No. 9213—Phase II.
...253 (D.D.C.1972), aff'd per curiam, 4 E.R.C. 1815 (D.C.Cir.1972), aff'd by an equally divided Court sub nom., Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 93 S.Ct. 2770, 37 L.Ed.2d 140 (1973), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7470-7491 (1980) (re Clear Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.); United States Steel Corp. v. Trai......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Preventing Significant Deterioration Under the Clean Air Act: Area Classification, Initial Allocation, and Redesignation
...1972), af’d without opinion , 4 Env’t Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1815 (D.C. Cir. 1972), af’d by an equally divided Court sub nom. Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 3 ELR 20684 (1973). 17. See 38 Fed. Reg. 18986, 18990-91 (July 16, 1973) (“Air Quality Increment Plan”). he Agency proposed increments for......
-
Prevention of Significant Deterioration: A Scalpel, Not an Axe
...Sierra Club v. Ruckelshaus, 4 Env’t Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1815 (D.C. Cir. 1972), af’d by an equally divided court sub nom . Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 3 ELR 20684 (1973). 12. Implementation Plans: Prevention of Signiicant Deterioration, 39 Fed. Reg. 42510 (Dec. 5, 1974). 13. Pub. L. No. 95......
-
Fairness in environmental law.
...individual trees violated the Act). (65) Sierra Club v. Ruckelshaus, 344 F. Supp. 253 (D.D.C. 1972), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 412 U.S. 541 (1973) (holding regulation permitting states to submit plans allowing air production levels to rise was contrary to Congress' intent in passin......
-
Prevention of Significant Deterioration: A Case for Repeal
...(D.D.C. 1972), af’d per curiam , 4 ERC 1815, 2 ELR 20656 (D.C. Cir. 1972), af’d by an equally divided court sub nom. Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 3 ELR 20684 (1973). 4. he goals and purpose of the statute are generally understood to explain what is to be achieved by the substantive pro......
Request a trial to view additional results