Fri v. Sierra Club, No. 72-804

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation93 S.Ct. 2770,37 L.Ed.2d 140,412 U.S. 541
Docket NumberNo. 72-804
PartiesRobert W. FRI, Acting Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, petitioner, v. SIERRA CLUB et al
Decision Date11 June 1973

Lawrence G. Wallace, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Bruce J. Terris, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
48 practice notes
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 29, 2005
    • 29 d2 Novembro d2 2005
    ...Supp. 253 (D.D.C. 1972), aff'd per curiam 4 ERC 1815 (D.C. Circuit, 1972), aff'd by an equally divided court, sub nom Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541 4. Final Action and Legal Basis for Changes on Applicability of Appendix S and the Transitional NSR Program a. Final Changes on Applicabilit......
  • Air programs: Ambient air quality standards, national— 8-hour ozone standard, Phase 2, etc.; implementation,
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 29, 2005
    • 29 d2 Novembro d2 2005
    ...Supp. 253 (D.D.C. 1972), aff'd per curiam 4 ERC 1815 (D.C. Circuit, 1972), aff'd by an equally divided court, sub nom Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541 4. Final Action and Legal Basis for Changes on Applicability of Appendix S and the Transitional NSR Program a. Final Changes on Applicabilit......
  • Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. Epa, No. 02-658.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 21 d3 Janeiro d3 2004
    ...1972), aff'd per curiam, 4 E. R. C. 1815, 2 Env. L. Rep. 20656 (CADC 1972), aff'd by an equally divided court sub nom. Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541 (1973) (per 3. The PSD program also requires visibility control measures, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7491-7492, not at issue in this case. 4. As enacted ......
  • Philadelphia Council of Neighborhood Organizations v. Coleman, Civ. A. No. 77-180.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • 12 d1 Setembro d1 1977
    ...344 F.Supp. 253 (D.D. C.1972), aff'd (per curiam), 4 ERC 1815 (D.C.Cir. 1972), aff'd by an equally divided Court, Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 93 S.Ct. 2770, 37 L.Ed.2d 140 (1973). In that case, plaintiffs sought to enjoin the Administrator of the EPA from approving certain portions of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
38 cases
  • Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. Epa, No. 02-658.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 21 d3 Janeiro d3 2004
    ...1972), aff'd per curiam, 4 E. R. C. 1815, 2 Env. L. Rep. 20656 (CADC 1972), aff'd by an equally divided court sub nom. Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541 (1973) (per 3. The PSD program also requires visibility control measures, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7491-7492, not at issue in this case. 4. As enacted ......
  • Philadelphia Council of Neighborhood Organizations v. Coleman, Civ. A. No. 77-180.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • 12 d1 Setembro d1 1977
    ...344 F.Supp. 253 (D.D. C.1972), aff'd (per curiam), 4 ERC 1815 (D.C.Cir. 1972), aff'd by an equally divided Court, Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 93 S.Ct. 2770, 37 L.Ed.2d 140 (1973). In that case, plaintiffs sought to enjoin the Administrator of the EPA from approving certain portions of......
  • City of Highland Park, Ill. v. Train, s. 74-1271
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • 24 d4 Julho d4 1975
    ...253, 254 (D.D.C.1972), aff'd per curiam, 4 E.R.C. 1815 (D.C.Cir.1972), aff'd by an equally divided Court sub nom., Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 93 S.Ct. 2770, 37 L.Ed.2d 140 (1973). In the Sierra Club case the court held, on motion for preliminary injunction, that the Administrator had......
  • United States v. State of Wash., Civ. No. 9213—Phase II.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Western District of Washington)
    • 26 d5 Setembro d5 1980
    ...F.Supp. 253 (D.D.C.1972), aff'd per curiam, 4 E.R.C. 1815 (D.C.Cir.1972), aff'd by an equally divided Court sub nom., Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 93 S.Ct. 2770, 37 L.Ed.2d 140 (1973), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7470-7491 (1980) (re Clear Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.); United States Steel Corp.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Prevention of Significant Deterioration: A Scalpel, Not an Axe
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 48-4, April 2018
    • 1 d0 Abril d0 2018
    ...Sierra Club v. Ruckelshaus, 4 Env’t Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1815 (D.C. Cir. 1972), af’d by an equally divided court sub nom . Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 3 ELR 20684 (1973). 12. Implementation Plans: Prevention of Signiicant Deterioration, 39 Fed. Reg. 42510 (Dec. 5, 1974). 13. Pub. L. No. 95......
  • Preventing Significant Deterioration Under the Clean Air Act: Area Classification, Initial Allocation, and Redesignation
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 41-1, January 2011
    • 1 d6 Janeiro d6 2011
    ...1972), af’d without opinion , 4 Env’t Rep. Cas. (BNA) 1815 (D.C. Cir. 1972), af’d by an equally divided Court sub nom. Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 3 ELR 20684 (1973). 17. See 38 Fed. Reg. 18986, 18990-91 (July 16, 1973) (“Air Quality Increment Plan”). he Agency proposed increments for......
  • Prevention of Significant Deterioration: A Case for Repeal
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 47-9, September 2017
    • 1 d5 Setembro d5 2017
    ...(D.D.C. 1972), af’d per curiam , 4 ERC 1815, 2 ELR 20656 (D.C. Cir. 1972), af’d by an equally divided court sub nom. Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541, 3 ELR 20684 (1973). 4. he goals and purpose of the statute are generally understood to explain what is to be achieved by the substantive pro......
  • LITIGATING EPA RULES: A FIFTY-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RULEMAKING IN THE COURTS.
    • United States
    • Case Western Reserve Law Review Vol. 70 No. 4, June 2020
    • 22 d1 Junho d1 2020
    ...(18.) Sierra Club v. Ruckelshaus, 344 F.Supp. 253 (D.D.C. 1972), upheld by an equally divided Supreme Court, sub nom. Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541 (19.) Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1976). See generally Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., 1History Belongs to the Winners': The Baze......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT