Friedlander v. State, 88-1014

• Decision Date: 03 April 1991
• Docket Number: No. 88-1014,88-1014
• Citation: 16 Fla. L. Weekly 871,577 So.2d 673
• Parties: 16 Fla. L. Weekly 871 Mitchell K. FRIEDLANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals

Page 673

577 So.2d 673

16 Fla. L. Weekly 871

Mitchell K. FRIEDLANDER, Appellant, v.STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-1014.

District Court of Appeal of Florida Fourth District.

April 3, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Mel Grossman, Judge.

Mitchell K. Friedlander, Atlanta, Ga., pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.Appellant waived his right to appeal upon entering his plea to thirteen counts charging a scheme to defraud.There was no reservation of a right to appeal.We also note that appellant has never sought to withdraw his plea and permit the state to reinstate the one hundred charges dropped contemporaneously with his entering the plea.Additionally, appellant's claims of lack of jurisdiction are without merit.Cf.Hoover v. State, 530 So.2d 308(Fla.1988);Maralit v. State, 468 So.2d 490(Fla. 1st DCA1985);Livolsi v. State, 451 So.2d 542(Fla. 2d DCA1984).In any event, our examination of the issues raised by appellant reflects that he was convicted of a crime which is distinct from the misdemeanor appellant asserts was applicable under the regulatory statute that he contends governed his activities.

DELL, STONE...