Friedman v. Meyer

Decision Date18 October 1982
Citation90 A.D.2d 511,59 N.Y.2d 763,454 N.Y.S.2d 909
PartiesAnn FRIEDMAN et al., Respondents, v. Albert MEYER, M.D. et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Furey, Furey, Gerver & McHenry, P. C., Hempstead (Robert K. Lapping, Hempstead, of counsel), for appellant Franklin General Hosp.

Kelly, Rode, Kelly & Burke, Mineola (Stephen P. Burke, Mineola, of counsel), for appellantAlbert Meyer(relying upon the brief submitted on behalf of the appellant hospital).

Gerald J. Mondora, New York City, for respondents.

Before THOMPSON, J. P., and BRACKEN, RUBIN and BOYERS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In a medical malpractice action, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 2, 1981, denying their respective motions for summary judgment.

Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements payable to the appellant hospital, and defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted.

Plaintiffs allege that due to the negligence of defendants, or because of actions taken by them without the plaintiff wife's informed consent, the plaintiff wife was caused to deliver a stillborn infant.No physical injuries are claimed.Rather, the plaintiff wife seeks to recover solely for mental or emotional injuries and her husband seeks to recover for the loss of his wife's services.Special Term denied defendants' motions for summary judgment.We reverse.

It is by now well established that even assuming the death of the fetus in utero was caused by defendants' wrongful acts, absent independent physical injuries, the plaintiff wife may not recover for emotional and psychic harm as a result of the stillborn birth (seeVaccaro v. Squibb Corp., 52 N.Y.2d 809, 436 N.Y.S.2d 871, 418 N.E.2d 386;Becker v. Schwartz, 46 N.Y.2d 401, 386 N.Y.S.2d 807, 386 N.E.2d 807;Howard v. Lecher, 42 N.Y.2d 109, 397 N.Y.S.2d 363, 366 N.E.2d 64;see, also, Lafferty v. Manhasset Med. Center Hosp., 54 N.Y.2d 277, 445 N.Y.S.2d 111, 429 N.E.2d 789;Aquilio v. Nelson, 78 A.D.2d 195, 434 N.Y.S.2d 520).Endresz v. Friedberg, 24 N.Y.2d 478, 301 N.Y.S.2d 65, 248 N.E.2d 901, does not command otherwise.That case held that no action for wrongful death could be maintained by the personal representative of a stillborn fetus, although the plaintiff wife was held entitled to recover for the mental injuries she sustained, including "the emotional upset attending the stillbirths", as a concomitant to the actual physical injuries she had...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
29 cases
  • Individually v. Uniondale Union Free Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • March 31, 2010
    ...194 (2009) (quoting Creed v. United Hosp., 190 A.D.2d 489, 491, 600 N.Y.S.2d 151 (App.Div.1993)); see, e.g., Friedman v. Meyer, 90 A.D.2d 511, 512, 454 N.Y.S.2d 909 (App.Div.1982), appeal dismissed 59 N.Y.2d 763 (“plaintiff['s] wife may not recover for emotional and psychic harm as a result......
  • Tebbutt v. Virostek
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 13, 1985
    ...plaintiff's complaint, alleging only emotional distress, lacked merit as a matter of law. Special Term, relying upon Friedman v. Meyer, 90 A.D.2d 511, 454 N.Y.S.2d 909,appeal dismissed 59 N.Y.2d 763, granted defendant's motion and dismissed the complaint. The Appellate Division, Third Depar......
  • Khan v. Hip Hosp., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 28, 1985
    ...Division, Second Department, cases which dismissed claims allegedly identical to the claim presented herein. In Friedman v. Meyer, 90 A.D.2d 511-512, 454 N.Y.S.2d 909, appeal dismissed 59 N.Y.2d 763 the Court "Plaintiffs allege that due to the negligence of defendants, or because of actions......
  • Paradiso v. Colonial Townhouses, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • March 7, 1988
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT