Friedman v. United States
| Decision Date | 30 March 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 675,675 |
| Citation | 3 L.Ed.2d 759,359 U.S. 205,79 S.Ct. 738 |
| Parties | Irving D. FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Irving D. Friedman and Sol Friedman, for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, and Mr. Robert W. Ginnane, for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
Messrs. Joseph H. Wright and Erle J. Zoll, Jr., for railroad appellees.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
43 cases
-
People v. House
... ... 337, 340, explained why such cases as Gordon v. United States (1967) 127 U.S.App.D.C. 343, 383 F.2d 936, cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1029, 88 S.Ct. 1421, 20 ... ...
-
Wolfe v. State of North Carolina
... ... of the requirements of rules of state procedural law within the Constitutional power of the States to define, and here clearly delineated and even-handedly applied. We have no choice but to ... v. City of Cedar Rapids, 223 U.S. 655, 32 S.Ct. 389, 56 L.Ed. 594; see United Gas Public Service Co. v. State of Texas, 303 U.S. 123, 143, 625, 58 S.Ct. 483, 493, 82 L.Ed. 702 ... ...
-
Parker v. Ellis
... ... This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas alleging unlawful detention under a ... ...
-
Henry v. State
... ... at 670, 566 A.2d at 116-17. Furthermore, Maryland Rule 4-312(d) states that after the court has questioned the potential jurors, it may allow the parties to supplement ... Although a defendant has the right to prove a juror is biased, Dennis v. United States, 339 U.S. 162, 171-72, 70 S.Ct. 519, 523, 94 L.Ed. 734, 742 ... Page 221 ... (1950), ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results